Teaching in Interactive Pedagogical Perspective at Primary Schools in Northern Mountainous Provinces of Vietnam

Duc-Hoa  Pho

Authors

Duc-Hoa Pho

Keywords:

Interactive pedagogy, primary school, strong points, weak points

Abstract

With the efforts to improve the quality of education, Vietnam
has released specific policies to develop teaching staff and invested the
facilities to serve teaching and learning. In order to reduce the gap in the
quality of education among regions, and to ensure the needs and rights
of learning of every child in our country, the Education Sector has
implemented the Strategies for the Development of Education 2011 –
2020 with one significant task “Enhancing support for the educational
development for disadvantaged areas, ethnic minorities, and social
policy beneficiaries.” Education in disadvantaged areas is still assessed
as being weak in many aspects such as teaching quality and educational
efficiency. Besides, many teachers have not met the goal of improving
the quality of teaching and learning, and teaching methods as well as
educational contents have not developed well.
Starting from practical teaching, we discussed the situation of using
interactive pedagogy in modern teaching at primary schools in
Northern mountainous provinces of Vietnam. In an educational process,
mutual impacts between the factors - teachers, students, and the
environment - are considered holistically and comprehensively. This
approach reflects the teaching trend based on students and their
activities, especially the nerve activities of learners. Interactive teaching
in the pedagogical environment is reviewed and researched under
multidimensional perspectives.

References

Alan D., Janet E, Finlay-Gregory D. & Abowd-Russell B. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition).Hardcover â€“Prentice Hal.

Charles, L. (2006). Applying constructivism and inquiry models in teaching volume-temperature relationship of gases (Charles law). Penang,Malaysia.SEAMEO Regional Centre for Education.

Derek B. (2009). Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. Jossey-Bass Publishing.

Denomme, J. M. & and Roy, M. (2000). Toward an interactive pedagogy. Hanoi. Youth Publishing.

Dragos. V. (2011), Interactive teaching and learning in primary school (Applications in the curricular area â€œMathematics and sciencesâ€), Doctoral Dissertation.

Hoa, D. P., (2009). Active teaching and the approaches in teaching primary schools.Hanoi, Hanoi National University of Education Publishing.

Hoa, D. P., & Son, Q. N. (2011). Methods and technology in teaching in interactive pedagogical environment. Hanoi National University of Education Publishing.

Hung T. D., & Ha H. T. T., & Hoan K. T., & Khanh. V. T. (2012). Teaching method theory. University of Thai Nguyen Publishing, Vietnam.

Moyles, J., & and Hargreaves, L. (2003) Interactive teaching in the primary school. Maidenhead, Philadelphia.Open University Press.

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction- A methodological framework. New York.

Rob, C. (2014). Separating work and play: privacy, anonymity and the politics of interactive pedagogy in deploying facebook in learning and teaching, Digital Culture & Education, 6(1).

http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/2347/1/umi-umd-2204.pdf

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03177413

http://rusc.uoc.edu/index.php/rusc/article/view/v10n2-pineda-hennig-segovia/v10n2-pineda-hennig-segovia-eng

http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Redmond-full.pdf

http://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Koehler_et_al_2013.pdf

http://link.springer.com/articale/10.1007/BF03177413

http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobartf