Reflection and Innovation Approach in Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning for Strengthening the Pancasila Learner Profile among Secondary School Students

Authors

  • Sapta Kesuma
  • Evi Susilawati
  • Tri Astuti Mardiana
  • Halimah Tussadiah Lubis
  • Ila Ramayati Nasution
  • Juliansyah Putra Tanjung
  • Tjiong Adrian Purnomo
  • Cut Rafyqa Fadhilah

Keywords:

Reflection and Innovation approach; Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning; Pancasila Learner Profile; character education; secondary school students

Abstract

Developing students who embody the Pancasila Learner Profile remains a central objective of Indonesia's Merdeka Curriculum, yet many schools struggle to translate these expected values into classroom practice. Meanwhile, smartphones are integral to adolescents' daily lives, though their potential to support character education remains underused. This study examined whether integrating a Reflection and Innovation approach into Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning could improve students' character development more effectively than conventional instruction. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control-group pretest-posttest design was conducted with 384 Grade Eleven students (192 experimental, 192 control). Character development was assessed using a 60-item Pancasila Learner Profile Questionnaire with strong content validity (CVI = .89) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's ? = .93). After eight weeks, students exposed to the intervention outperformed the comparison group (M = 82.6 vs. 63.4; t(382) = 18.18, p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.86), with large effect sizes across all six dimensions (d = 1.37–1.53). The intervention also produced a substantially higher Normalised Gain (g = .65) than conventional learning (g = .27), while students reported very positive learning experiences (91.1% positive responses). These findings indicate that combining structured reflection, authentic project work, and technology-supported learning provides an effective pathway for strengthening multidimensional character development among secondary school students.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.8.43

References

Anselmo, C. T., Prudente, M. S., Aquino, J. L. R., Dumelod, D. A., & Cabrera, F. R. (2025). A systematic review of the effectiveness of mobile learning tools in enhancing physics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1). https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/11850

Bitto Urbanova, L., Madarasova Geckova, A., Dankulincova Veselska, Z., Capikova, S., Holubcikova, J., van Dijk, J. P., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2023). “I could do almost nothing without digital technology”: A qualitative exploration of adolescents’ perception of the risks and challenges of digital technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1237452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237452

BPS-Statistics Indonesia Medan Municipality. (2024). Number of schools, teachers, and pupils in senior high schools under the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology by district in Medan Municipality, 2023/2024. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. https://medankota.bps.go.id

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Brown, M., McGrath, R. E., Bier, M. C., Johnson, K., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2023). A comprehensive meta-analysis of character education programs. Journal of Moral Education, 52(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2060196

Chounta, I. A., Hoppe, H. U., Nolte, A., & Spikol, D. (2023). Editorial: Re-inventing project-based learning: Hackathons, datathons, devcamps as learning expeditions. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1182264. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1182264

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K. O., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Huang, L., Wang, R., & Han, J. (2024). Regulation of emotions in project-based collaborative learning: An empirical study in academic English classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1368196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368196

Jovi?, J., ?orac, A., Stanimirovi?, A., Nikoli?, M., Stojanovi?, M., Bukumiri?, Z., & Ignjatovi? Risti?, D. (2024). Using machine learning algorithms and techniques for defining the impact of affective temperament types, content search and activities on the internet on the development of problematic internet use in adolescents’ population. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1326178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1326178

Kar, S. S., Dube, R., Goud, B. K. M., Gibrata, Q. S., El-Balbissi, A. A., Al Salim, T. A., & Fatayerji, R. N. M. A. K. (2025). Impact of screen time on development of children. Children, 12(10), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12101297

Kesuma, S., Susilawati, E., Tanjung, J. P., Fadhilah, C. R., Admiral, R. D., Mardiansyah, M., Lubis, H. T., Nasution, I. R., Purnomo, T. A., & Harahap, E. S. (2025). Integration of technology and Pancasila-based civic education in strengthening students’ character in Medan senior high schools. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(11), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i11.11050

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kizys, D., Lotter, C., Perez, L., Gilreath, R., & Limberg, D. (2025). Integrating community assets, place-based learning, and career development through project-based learning in rural settings. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1577093. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1577093

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lee, A., & Jung, E. (2025). University students’ subjective experiences with problem-based learning and associated generic skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1618997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1618997

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mehrfar, A., Zolfaghari, Z., Bordbar, A., & Mohabbat, Z. (2024). Influencing factors on the success of mobile learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 42(3), Article e09. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n3e09

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran [Decree of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Number 56/M/2022 on guidelines for curriculum implementation in the context of learning recovery]. https://bpmpkaltara.kemendikdasmen.go.id/2022/02/20/keputusan-mendikbudristek-nomor-56-m-2022-tentang-pedoman-penerapan-kurikulum-dalam-rangka-pemulihan-pembelajaran

Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., Usmeldi, Dhanil, M., & Tanjung, M. R. (2023). The effectiveness of smartphone-based interactive multimedia integrated cognitive conflict models to improve 21st-century skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1793–1801. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1991

Mutanga, M. B. (2024). Students’ perspectives and experiences in project-based learning: A qualitative study. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040052

Pupik Dean, C. G., Grossman, P., Enumah, L., Herrmann, Z., & Schneider Kavanagh, S. (2023). Core practices for project-based learning: Learning from experienced practitioners in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, Article 104275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104275

Solehuddin, M., Budimansyah, D., & Dahliyana, A. (2024). Tracing Pancasila: Unveiling the impact of the Pancasila student profile strengthening project on student well-being in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 43(3), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i3.78328

Susilawati, E., Kesuma, S., Leman, D., Yusrita, Y., Fauzan, A., Habil, H., Viona, D., & Hummairah, C. A. (2025). The economic potential of using the AI-based ASES-EdTech platform to improve the professionalism of elementary school teachers in rural areas of Indonesia. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(11), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i11.11009

Trisiana, A., Priyanto, A., & Sutoyo, S. (2024). Analysis of developing anti-corruption education in Indonesia through media-based citizenship education learning smart mobile civic. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 43(1), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.60261

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education — A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

Vladova, G., Ullrich, A., Sloane, M., Renz, A., & Tsui, E. (2023). Editorial: New teaching and learning worlds — Potentials and limitations of digitalization for innovative and sustainable research and practice in education and training. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1175498. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1175498

Von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S., Oddleifson, C., Way, J. D., & Welliver, M. (2023). Reconceptualizing social and emotional competence assessment in school settings. Journal of Intelligence, 11(12), Article 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11120217

Voogt, J. M., & Pareja Roblin, N. N. (2023). Curriculum and 21st century skills. In International encyclopedia of education (4th ed., pp. 49–55). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.03007-4

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warlim, W., Effendi, R., Fitria, R., Ibrahim, M. M., & Hadiati, D. N. (2026). Cross-faculty analysis of AI-enhanced civic character education on digital citizenship development. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1690799. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1690799

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.

Widowati, A., & Tyas, R. A. (2024). Mobile-based learning in science trends: A systematic review (2015–2023). Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2303563. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2303563

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Zaenab, S., Chamisijatin, L., Wahyudi, M. D. R., & Pratama, D. C. (2024). Characteristics of project-based learning models on the project to strengthening the Pancasila student profiles at Muhammadiyah school. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, 8(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i2.1820

Zha, S., Qiao, Y., Hu, Q., Li, Z., Gong, J., & Xu, Y. (2024). Designing child-centric AI learning environments: Insights from LLM-enhanced creative project-based learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.16159

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Kesuma, S. ., Susilawati, E. ., Mardiana, T. A. ., Lubis, H. T. ., Nasution, I. R. ., Tanjung, J. P. ., Purnomo, T. A. ., & Fadhilah, C. R. . (2026). Reflection and Innovation Approach in Technology-Supported Project-Based Learning for Strengthening the Pancasila Learner Profile among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(8), 1090–1110. Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/3032