Implementation of a Teaching and Learning Model: Institutional, Programme and Discipline level at a University of Technology in South Africa.

Authors

  • Pauline Cathleen Machika

Keywords:

Implementation; Teaching and Learning; Model; Institutional Programme; Discipline Level

Abstract

To improve the quality of teaching in a university of
technology and to produce the necessary graduate skills which will
improve the economy of South Africa (Altbach, Reisberg and Rumbley
2009), a teaching and learning model should be implemented at three
levels, namely the institution-wide, programme and discipline-specific
level. Universities of technology are increasingly required to implement
a teaching and learning model with an appropriate operational plan.
Based on research that was conducted at a South African university of
technology, this article focuses on the importance of implementing a
teaching and learning model with an operational plan, from the
perspective of academic staff who experience tensions at the three
above-mentioned levels. Within the state of flux due to the transition
from technikon to university status, the university of technology in
question has experienced difficulty in positively changing its
institutional context to an enabling environment in terms of its teaching
and learning model. Four individual interviews and nine group
interviews were conducted with thirty-six academic staff members. The
results show that a disenabling environment is created for teaching and
learning at a university of technology if the teaching and learning model
is not implemented at an institutional level and is not cascaded down to
a programme and discipline-specific level within a university-wide
operational plan.

References

Abualrub, I., Karseth, B. & B. Stensaker. (2013). The various understandings of learning

environment in higher education and its quality implications, Quality in Higher Education 19(1), 90–110.

Adams, R.G. & Granic, A. (2009). Cognitive learning approaches to the design of accessible e-learning systems. In: Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: integrating human factors and personalization. Mourlas, Constantinos and Tsianos, Nikos and Germanakos, Panagiotis , eds. Information Science Publishing. ISBN 9781605663920.

Altbach, P. G., L. Reisberg, & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in global higher education:

Tracking an academic revolution. A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World

Conference on Higher Education. http://www.unesco.org/tools/fileretrieve/2844977e.pdf.

Cameron, K. & Quin, R.E.. (2006). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of

learning and teaching, Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education,

Australia. Gibb, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Higher Education Academy, September 2010.

Hénard, F. & D. Roseveare. (2012). Fostering Quality Teaching in Higher Education: Policies and Practices. Institutional Management in Higher Education, www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/.

Henning, E., W. van Rensburg & Smit, B. (2004). Finding your way in Qualitative Research. Van Schaik: Pretoria.

HESA (Higher Education South Africa). (2012). Response to the Green Paper for Postâ€School Education and Training.

Haung, L. S. & Fisher, D. (2011). Association of the University Learning Environment with

Academic Engagement and Satisfaction among Science Majors in Taiwan. The Asian-Pacific Education Researcher 20(2), 291-307

Knapper, C. (2003). Three decades of educational development. International Journal for

Academic Development 8(1/2), 5–9.

Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-Impact Education Practices. Washington D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, J. Schuh., E. Whitt,. & Associates. (2010). Students’ success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lazerson, M., U. Wagener & Shumanis, N. (2000). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1980–2000 Change 32(3), 2000, 12–19.

National Planning Commission. (2012). Our future make it work. National Development Plan 2030.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2012). Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives: A Strategic Approach to Skills Policies, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264177338-en.

Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students, Volume 2, A Third Decade of Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Scott, I.R. (2009). Higher Education Studies in South Africa: Academic Development. Unpublished manuscript.

Scott, I. R., N. Yeld & Hendry, J. (2007). Higher education monitor: A case for improving

teaching and learning in South African higher education. Pretoria: Council on Higher

Education.

Tinto, V. (2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 8(1): 1–19.

Watts, J., R. Mackay, D. Horton, A. Hall, B. Douthwaite, R. Chambers & Acosta, A. (2007). Institutional Learning and Change: An Introduction, ILAC Working Paper 3, second edition, Institutional Learning and Change Initiative, Bioversity International, Rome : Maccarese (Fiumicino).

Wolf-Wendel, L., K. Ward & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success Journal of College Student Development, 50: 407–428.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles