The Perceived Influence of Learning Environment on Design Student Imagination

Authors

  • Ju-Sen Lin
  • Chaoyun Liang

Keywords:

design education; design process; imagination stimulation;learning environment

Abstract

This study was aimed to analyze the perceived influence of
learning environment on design student imagination in different design
phases. Participants (n = 1,004) involved in this study were design
school students from ten universities across Taiwan. Influences in the
learning environment were deconstructed into four factors: physical
component, organizational measure, social climate, and human
aggregate. Our results indicated that social climate was claimed to be the
greatest influential factor, followed by organizational measure, human
aggregate, and finally physical component. These various effects were seen
in the design process, especially in the phase of problem definition and
design analysis, and with a lesser effect in the phase of detailed design
and communication.

References

American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative:

Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: American College Personnel

Association.

Büscher, M., Eriksen, M. A., Kristensen, J. F., & Mogensen, P. H. (2004). Ways of

grounding imagination. Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design:

Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices (Vol. 1). Retrieved

May 25, 2013, from

http://www.daimi.au.dk/Workspace/site/content/heading_07/papers/PDC2

pdf.

Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and

Cognition, 5(3), 381-393.

Huebner, L. A., & Lawson, J. M. (1990). Understanding and assessing college

environment. In D. G. Creamer, &Associates, College student development: Theory

and practice for the 1990s (pp. 127-151). Alexandria, VA: ACPA.

Liang, C., Chang, C. -C.,Chang, Y., & Lin, L. -J. (2012). The exploration of imagination

indicators. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 366-374.

Liang, C., Hsu, Y., & Chang, C. -C. (2013). Intrinsic motivation as a mediator on

imaginative capability development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8(1), 109-119.

Liang, C., Hsu, Y., Huang, Y., & Chen, S. -C. (2012). How learning environments can

stimulate student imagination. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 11(4), 432- 441.

Passmore, J. (1985). Recent philosophers: A supplement to a hundred years of philosophy. NY:

Duckworth.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C. E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., &Bragge, J.

(2006). The design science research process: A model for producing and

presenting information system research. In proceedings of DESRIST 2006,

Claremont, CA., 83-106.

Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. G. (1990). Understanding academic cultures and climate.

In W. G. Tierney (Ed.). Assessing academic climates and cultures (pp. 3-18). San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Reichling, M. J. (1990). Images of imagination. Journal of Research in Music Education,

(4), 282-293.

Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation.

ACM Transactions on ComputereHuman Interaction, 7(1), 114-138.

Strange, C. C. (2000). Creating environments of ability. New Directions for Student Services,

, 19-30.

Strange, C. C. (2003). Dynamics of campus environments. In S. R. Komives, D. B.

Woodard, Jr., & Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession

(4th ed., pp. 297-316). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,

Inc.

Trotman, D. (2006). Evaluating the imaginative: Situated practice and the conditions for

professional judgment in imaginative education. International Journal of Education

& the Arts, 7(3). Retrieved March 25, 2013, from http://ijea.asu.edu/v7n3/.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-28