Correlation between Lecturers’ Professional Development Activities and their Competencies in Maldives Higher Education Institutes

Authors

  • Zuha Aishath
  • Intan Marfarrina Omar
  • Waheeda Aishath

Keywords:

professional development activities; higher education; lecturers’ competency

Abstract

The quality of higher education (HE) is one of the key areas the higher education system of the Maldives focuses on to develop and expand the sector. Two of the factors that contribute to and influence the quality of HE are professional development (PD) and lecturers’ competency. However, in the context of Maldives, although efforts are made in the area of PD, little to no research has been conducted in this area. Hence, the purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between lecturer PD activities and their competencies in Maldives’ higher education institutes. A quantitative research design was adopted, which conducted a cross-sectional survey by administering a structured online questionnaire. A total of 171 lecturers participated, which included both full-time and part-time lecturers from two public and two private institutions. Data analysis revealed that there is a weak positive correlation between PD activities and lecturers’ competency; rs(129)=0.232, p=0.008. It is also possible that PD activities conducted do not cater for the needs of lecturers, and a culture where structured and individual PD activities are supported and encouraged is not efficiently established. In light of these findings, it is important to strengthen and expand the existing PD policies and focus on providing effective PD sessions on topics and areas that are most needed for lecturers, rather than on generic topics. This study contributes to the empirical literature on PD in the context of Maldives and to the overall development of the HE sector.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.9.2

References

Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 83-110.

American Public University System. (n.d.). iRubric: PADM Lit Review/Theoretical Framework Rubric. American Public University System.

Badenhorst, C. (2018). Citation practices of postgraduate students writing literature reviews. London Review of Education.

Berman, E. A. (2017). An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Researchers' Data Management Practices at UVM: Integrated Findings to Develop Research Data Services. Journal of eScience Librarianshp, 6(1).

Bologna Working Group. (2005). A Framework for Qualificaitons of the European Higher Education Area. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.

Bootes, D. N., & Bailey, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Carracedo, F., Vilaró, J., González, J., Casas, P., Almiñana, J., Zaragoza, J., . . . Samsó, M. (2018). A proposal to develop and assess professional skills in engineering final year projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 400-413.

Chen, D.-T., Wang, Y.-M., & Lee, W. (2016). Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(1), 47-60.

Chen, H. L., Chen, W. T., & Lin, Y. L. (2016). Earned value project management: Improving the predictive power of planned value. International Journal of Project Management, 22-29.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1).

Cuozzo, B., Dumay, J., Palmaccio, M., & Lombardi, R. (2017). Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Fisch, C., & Block, J. (2018). Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(2018), 103-106.

Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2015). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating A Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your "House". Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

Illing, J. (2014). 2014. In W. Blackwell (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (pp. 331-347). The Association for the Study of Medical.

Izadinia, M. (2014). Authorship: The hidden voices of postgraduate TEFL students in Iran. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(4), 317-331.

Jawitz, J., Shay, S., & Moore, R. (2002). Management and assessment of final year projects in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 472-478.

Juntunen, M., & Lehenkari, M. (2021). A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis. Studies in higher education, 330-342.

Komba, S. C. (2015). The perceived importance of communication skills course among university students: the case of two universities in Tanzania. African Journal of Teacher Education.

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasi-Rodriguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16((2020)), 1023-1042.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Springer.

Malechwanzi, J. M., Lei, H., & Wang, L. (2016). Students' Perceptions and Faculty Measured Competencies in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 56-69.

Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International journal of project management, 446-457.

Norton, R. E. (2019). Herder's aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Cornell University Press.

Paul, J., & Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.

Quinlan, C. (2011). Business Research Methods (1st ed.). Hampshire: Southwestern Cengage Learning.

Randolph, J. J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13).

Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & rigor: How theoretical frameworks guide.

Roberts-Holmes, G. (2018). Doing your early years research project: A step by step guide. Sage.

Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Doing research in business & management: An essential guide to planning your project. Pearson.

Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students' difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Education, 7(1).

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 333-339.

Sodhar, I., Noor, D., Memon, I., & Malik, M. (2020). A survey of faced issues and challenges of undergraduate students in final year project. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 649-654.

Vereniging Hogescholen (Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences). (2019). The Professional Master Standard. Copenhagen: Vereniging Hogescholen.

Walter, L., & Stouck, J. (2020). Writing the Literature Review: Graduate Student Experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1).

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30