Exploring Agricultural Sciences Teachers’ Beliefs in Integrating Simulations and Hands-On Teaching Methods: A Multi-Case Study

Authors

  • Malesela Dennis Mashishi
  • Mmapake Florence Masha
  • Moses Sibusiso Mtshali
  • Suresh Kamar Singh
  • Mdumo Solomon Mboweni

Keywords:

Teacher beliefs; simulation-based learning; hands-on instruction and technology integration

Abstract

Beliefs are crucial in shaping teachers’ approaches to implementing innovative teaching methods. To drive change in educational practices, it is essential to understand the role of teachers’ beliefs, which are deeply embedded in their values and influence their classroom practices. This understanding is key to initiating meaningful change. Therefore, this study explores Agricultural Sciences teachers’ beliefs regarding the integration of simulation and hands-on instructional methods in South African secondary schools. Using a multiple case study design, three teachers from the Capricorn District were purposively selected and interviewed to examine their beliefs on (i) content comprehension, (ii) learner assessment, and (iii) the role of self-reflection in improving teaching practices. Findings reveal that teachers held predominantly positive beliefs about simulation and hands-on approaches, viewing them as effective tools for simplifying complex content, enhancing learner engagement, and improving academic performance. Although initially sceptical of technology-mediated assessments,  teachers experienced a transformation in their beliefs as they began to recognise the value of such approaches in promoting authentic learner understanding. This shift was influenced by their observation of improved learner comprehension and motivation, particularly using simulations and hands-on methods. Furthermore, the teachers emphasised the importance of self-reflection and ongoing professional development in enhancing and refining their instructional practices. The study highlights the dynamic nature of teacher beliefs, shaped by experiential learning and exposure to technological tools. Recommendations include sustained professional development, institutional support for digital integration, and further research into scalable implementation strategies. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on technology-enhanced pedagogy in science education, particularly within resource-constrained contexts. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.38

References

Acosta-Manzano, I., & Mercer, S. (2024). English foreign language teachers’ beliefs about adult learners’ engagement. The Language Learning Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2024.2370977

Ajani, O. A. (2024). Teachers’ competencies in digital integration of learning contents in dynamic classroom practices: A review of teacher professional development needs. Acta Educationis Generalis, 14(3), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2024-0016

Ama Gbemu, G., Adebayo, A., Mensah, E., & Chukwu, P. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about technology and its role in transforming teaching practices. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 25–40.

Ama, M., Daudi, M., & Nzilano, N. (2020). Teachers' beliefs and the use of simulation in education. Journal of Educational Research, 35(2), 120–132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260603071

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158

Bice, H., & Tang, H. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: A mixed methods study. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10179–10205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11044-1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Christiansen, I. (2014). Education Research: A methodological guide for students and researchers. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776919

Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed-methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384515

Demkanin, A., Liu, Y., & Thaheem, S. (2005). The role of technology in improving learning across disciplines. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 102–116. https://www.learntechlib.org/j/ISSN-0346-251X

Department of Basic Education. (2019). Diagnostic report, Part 01 content A. National Senior Certificate. South Africa: Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/DBE%20Diagnostic%20Report%202019%20-%20Book%201.pdf?ver=2020-02-06-140204-000

Department of Basic Education. (2022). National Curriculum Framework for ICT Integration in Education. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalCurriculumStatementsGradesR-12.aspx

Desimone, L. M. (2023). Rethinking teacher PD: A focus on how to improve student learning. Professional Development in Education, 49(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2162746

Dwived, R., Ertmer, P., & Liu, Y. (2019). Barriers to the effective use of ICT in classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12352

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Teacher beliefs and the integration of technology: A critical review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5

Freeman, Q., Flores, R., Garzón, D., Gumina, D., Sambolín Morales, A. N., Silva Diaz, E., & Stamatis, K. M. (2019). Collaborating towards humanizing pedagogies: Culture circles in teacher educator preparation. The New Educator, 16(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2019.1671567

Garcia-Alexander, G., Woo, H., & Carlson, M. J. (2017). Social structure and institutions. In Social foundations of behavior for the health sciences (pp. 1–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64950-4_7

Gbemu, O., Adu, E. O. & Adu, K. O. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and ICT integration in Ghanaian schools: A mixed-method study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2709–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10084-4

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hamoud, M., & Nzilano, N. (2024). Teachers' beliefs about simulations in science teaching in Tanzania. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1047-965. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024

Hlatswayo, M. & Ramnarain, U. (2019). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38 (1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1440

Hwang, J., Kim, J., & Kwon, N. Y. (2022). Development of an instrument measuring elementary pre-service teachers' beliefs on teaching and learning mathematics. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 25(1), 43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2022.25.1.43

Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning Journal, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398

Juggernath, D., & Governder, A. (2020). Natural Science teachers' beliefs and the use of ICT in teaching: A South African study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 1033–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10014-4

Juggernath, K. (2020). The role of simulation-based teaching in the Lesson Study process. Journal of Education Research and Practice, 38(3), 212–226. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/jerap/

Kamaruddin, S., Huda, N., & Padayachee, D. (2017). Simulations in Teaching and Learning: Perspectives from Malaysia. Journal of International Education, 12(3), 57–71. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/115178/1/115178

Kasa, Y., Areaya, S., & Woldemichael, M. (2024). Relationship between university teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics and their instructional practices. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335838

Khan, M. (2011). Interactive Computer Simulations: Definitions and Applications. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 121–135. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2

Khasawneh, O.Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.006

Kriek, E., & Stols, G. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and practices regarding educational technology in mathematics and physical science classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 10(3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i3.1675

Kriek, J. & Stols, G. (2010). Teachers' beliefs and their intention to use interactive simulations in their classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 30(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n3a353

Liu, Z., Wang, Y., & Henderson, M. (2022). Impact of simulation-based learning on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 33(4), 289–301. https://ijets.org/index.php/IJETS

Mayer, D. (2021). The connections and disconnections between teacher education policy and research: Reframing evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 47(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1842179

Niewenhuis, J. (2016). Qualitative research designs and data collection methods. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (pp. 70–91). Van Schaik. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3375856

Nzabarilwa, A. & Nduwayezu, G. (2022). Overcoming barriers to ICT integration in Rwandan classrooms. International Journal of Technology in Education, 17(3), 115–124. https://www.ijte.net/index.php/ijte

Olawale, B. E., & Hendricks, W. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their relationship with teaching practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), em2392. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14123

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Ertmer, P. & Tondeur, J. (2010). Teachers' beliefs and the adoption of technology in the classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9144-6

Raman, K. & Yamat, H. (2014). Barrier’s teachers face in integrating ICT during English lessons: A case study. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 156–162. http://mojet.net/

Ramnarain, U., Rumbidzai, N., & Teo, T. (2023). Exploring the pedagogical beliefs of South African Life Sciences teachers on ICT integration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21845

Ramorola, M. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of ICT integration in South African education. Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 399–413. https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjer20

Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, Research, Development and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532

Shenton, A.K. (2004). Strategies to ensure trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.

Sherman, R., & Howard, C. (2012). Exploring teachers' beliefs about technology use in Cape Town schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.02.003

Silviyanti, T. M. & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). The role of teachers' beliefs in the integration of technology in education. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 3(4), 1–6. https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/1779

Simamora, R., Sarjiwo, S., & Faliq, M. (2024). The role of teaching philosophy in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Development, 41(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024

Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986056

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Suleiman, A. P., Oladele, O. M., & Bambi, B.I. (2025). Brief history of the development of information and communication technology (ICT). In Management Information Systems in Education (pp. 21–49). Education Dialogue Association (EDUDIA) and the Institute for Educational Planning and Administration (IEPA).

Thaheem, S., Liu, Y., & Demkanin, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning: A review of simulation applications in education. Educational Review, 23(4), 56–68. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cedr20/75/2?nav=tocList

Tshewang, T. (2019). Simulation-based learning in the classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730

Van Der Ross, D., & Tsibolane, P. (2017). The influence of teacher attitudes and beliefs on information and communications technology integration behaviour in South African high schools. *CONF-IRM 2017 Proceedings, 32. https://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2017/32

Van Der Ross, M. & Tsibolane, M. (2017). Barriers to the use of simulations in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 37(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n2a1314

Webb, N.M. (2002). Pedagogical reasoning and action. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_2

Williams, C. (2019). Developing critical realist comparative methods for researching religions, belief systems, and education. Spanish Journal of Comparative Education, 33, 78–105. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.33.2019.23005

Wojney, R. (2006). Learning-centred approaches and technology in classrooms. Computers and Education, 47(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.003

Wyatt, M. (2024). Building language teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for and through action research. In The Routledge handbook of language teacher action research (1st ed., pp. 13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367352

Yang, Y.-F., Tseng, C. C., & Lai, S.-C. (2024). Enhancing teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in AI-based technology integration into English-speaking teaching through a professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104582

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modelling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30