Action Research Teacher Training Within a Project-Based Learning Paradigm
Keywords:
Action Research; Professional Development; Project Based Learning; Twenty-first Century CompetenciesAbstract
In response to socioeconomic, technological, and sustainability related challenges, schools and education systems are undergoing significant transformation. As a result, teachers are increasingly being asked to deliver innovative pedagogies such as Project Based Learning to help develop twenty-first century competencies that support effective real-world action in students. However, many educators possess no experience as students in project-based classrooms, which may result in a lack of mental frameworks pertaining to this distinctive educational methodology. This action research study explored how action research, framed within a project-based paradigm, may not only improve professional practice but also help faculty develop a better understanding of PBL. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews from 8 high school teachers and 2 professional development instructors in Beijing, China after they completed a self-paced action research teacher training set within a PBL paradigm. Findings suggested that the teachers not only experienced self-reported gains in pedagogical knowledge and teaching techniques that were the central purpose of their projects, but also gained understanding around action research, the value of collaboration with both colleagues and students, and Project Based Learning theory and practice. Connecting action research to project-based learning utilizing PBL design elements, teaching techniques, and project management structures assisted the participants in their own projects and produced transfer learning for their own classrooms. This study contributed to the scholarly discourse on training for action research by highlighting the perceived opportunities, challenges, and supports from the perspective of teachers as well as exploring the intersections between action research, PBL, and PBL teaching techniques such as utilization of project management processes and visualization methods.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.43
References
Alaidaros, H., Omar, M. & Romli, R. (2021). The state of the art of Agile kanban method: Challenges and opportunities. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(8), 2551-2560. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i8.1482.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.
Benson, J. & DeMaria, T. (2011). Personal kanban: Mapping work navigating life. CreateSpace.
Bergmark, U. (2022). The role of action research in teachers’ efforts to develop research-based education in Sweden: Intentions, outcomes, and prerequisite conditions. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1847155
Bessen, J. (2019). AI and jobs: The role of demand. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24235
Bialen, V. (2025). Teachers’ motivations, challenges and difficulties in action research: A narrative study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(2), 382-391. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0693
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
Borhan, M. T. (2014). Problem based learning (PBL) in teacher education: A review of the effect of PBL on pre-service teachers’ knowledge and skills. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1).
Boss, S. (2013). PBL for 21st century success: Teaching critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity. Buck Institute for Education.
Boss, S. & Larmer, J. (2018). Project-based teaching: How to create rigorous and engaging learning experiences. ASCD.
Brookfield, S. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. L. (2017). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. Springer.
Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. Working Paper. MDRC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578933.pdf
Crawford, R. (2022). Action research as evidence-based practice: Enhancing explicit teaching and learning through critical reflection and collegial peer observation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(12), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.6065
Crawford, R. (2025). Responding to the de-professionalisation of teaching: Empowering teachers to enhance their pedagogy through Action Research. Education Sciences, 15(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci15030274
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., Cervetti, G. N., & Tilson, J. L. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. Jossey-Bass.
Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-75). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Arikan, S. (2023). Dialogic Feedback for High Impact Learning: Key to PCP-Coaching and Assessment-as-Learning. Routledge.
Engane, J., & Gonzales, A. (2025). Unveiling public school teachers’ motivations and challenges in action research making: Basis for Project ReCREATe. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 40(3). 362-376. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.400304.
Grow, G. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed: A stage approach. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003001
Grow, G. (1994). In defense of the staged self-directed learning model. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369404400206
Hazard, R. (2023). Project-based learning for sustainable development: An open educational research framework for design. Proceedings of the IAFOR Barcelona Conference on Education (pp. 879–893). https://doi.org/ 0.22492/issn.2435-9467.2023.70
Hazard, R., & Liu, L. (2024). Teacher Training for Interdisciplinary Project Based Learning: A Professional Development Case Study. Proceedings of the 11th Asian Conference on Education & International Development (pp. 421–432). https://doi.org/ 10.22492/issn.2189-101X.2024.34
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Lambirth, A., & Cabral, A. (2017). Issues of agency, discipline and criticality: an interplay of challenges involved in teachers engaging in research in a performative school context, Educational Action Research, 25(4), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792. 2016.1218350
Lambirth, A., Cabral, A., McDonald, R., Philpott, C., Brett, A., & Magaji, A. (2019). Teacher-led professional development through a model of action research, collaboration and facilitation. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685565
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. & Boss., S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Leeman, Y., E. van Koeven, and F. Schaafsma. (2018). Inter-professional Collaboration in Action Research. Educational Action Research 26 (1): 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1301827
Lewin, K. (1946) Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
McDowell, M. (2017). Rigorous PBL by design: Three shifts for developing confident and competent learners. Corwin.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed). Taylor and Francis.
Milner, A. L. & Scholkmann, A. (2023): Future teachers for future societies: Transforming teacher professionalism through problem-based professional learning and development. Professional Development in Education, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2203173
Melin, U., Axelsson, K. & Wedlund, T. (2009). Project-based learning: Emergent framework for designing courses. Information Systems Education Journal, 7(34), 3-11. http://isedj.org/7/34/
Merriam, S. B. & Baumgartner, L. M. (2020). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Neville, A. J. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. Medical Principles and Practice, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000163038
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Reimagining education, realising potential. International Summit on the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b44e2c39-en.
Pachauri, Y. & Gure, G. (2024). Self-directed learning: An essential learning skill for the amelioration of 21st century learners. In Proceedings of the 1st Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies - PAMIR; SciTePress, 724-728. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012502500003792
Rao, N., & Norton, L. (2020). Dialogic feedback: what we know and what remains to be known. In P. Baughan (Ed.), On your marks: Learner-focused feedback practices and feedback literacy (pp. 159-168). Advance HE.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School Leadership and Student Outcomes: Identifying What Works and Why. New Zealand Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/60170
Saeed, M., Isnani, A., Khan, S. A & Khamis, N. (2020). Students’ feedback about feedback; Have our PBL tutors started the shift towards a dialogic ask-tell-ask approach? Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 36(7). 1698-1702. 10.12669/pjms.36.7.1778.
Schrader-Naef, R. (2000). Foundations of self-directed lifelong learning. In G. A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of self-directed learning (pp. 143–169). Waxmann.
Stewart, D. W., Brown, S. D., Clavier, C.W., & Wyatt, J. (2011). Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(6), Article 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe75468
Stolk, J., D., & Martello, R. (2018). Reimagining and empowering the design of projects: A project-based learning goals framework, Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 2109-2117). IEEE.
UNESCO. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. A. Leicht, J. Heiss, and W. J. Byun (Eds.). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from: www.unesdoc.unesco.org
UNESCO. (2020). Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd Ed.). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Williams, B. (2001). The theoretical links between problem-based learning and self-directed learning for continuing professional nursing education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029626
Zhao, Y. (2015). A world at risk: An imperative for a paradigm shift to cultivate 21st century learners. Society, 52(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9872-8
Zhao, P. (2025). The Structure and Implementation Strategies of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Courses in Legal Education. Journal of Education and Learning. 14(3). 328-336. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n3p328.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Russell Hazard, Randal Eplin, Liu Li, Yaw Owusu-Agyeman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
