Supporting Students with Learning Disabilities through Universal Design for Learning: Saudi Teachers' Perceptions in K-12 Education

Authors

  • Ahmed Lowiheg Aldousari

Keywords:

Universal Design for Learning; Inclusive Education; Learning Disabilities; Teachers’ Perceptions; Professional Development

Abstract

Universal Design for Learning (UDL), a framework developed to address the needs of all learners, including those with learning disabilities, has gained recognition and support from educational research. This qualitative study aims to explore teachers' perceptions regarding the integration of UDL in educational settings in Saudi Arabia, within K-12 educational frameworks. The primary focus is on the impact on special learners, including those with learning disabilities. Key research questions include: What are teachers’ perceptions of UDL and its effectiveness in supporting students, particularly those with learning disabilities? (2) What challenges do teachers face in implementing UDL, and what strategies do they believe would facilitate successful implementation? and (3). What do teachers perceive they need from the school district to apply UDL in their schools? Ten teachers selected based on criteria such as experience levels and teaching subjects were utilized for the study. The findings revealed prevalent concerns among teachers regarding the feasibility of UDL implementation, citing challenges such as a lack of training, inadequate resources, and limited administrative support. Despite these obstacles, teachers emphasized the critical need for enhanced support and training in UDL principles to address deficiencies and enhance student outcomes. Furthermore, teachers highlighted the importance of infrastructure and resource allocation for effective UDL implementation, stressing the pivotal role of school administrators in providing necessary support. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing professional development and resource allocation to create inclusive learning environments that benefit all students, including those with learning disabilities.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.17

References

Abell, M. M., Jung, E., & Taylor, M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of classroom instructional environments in the context of ‘Universal Design for Learning’. Learning Environments Research, 14(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9092-2

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): a content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295

Aldousari, A. L., & Dunn, M. (2022). Special Education for Students with Learning Disabilities in Saudi Arabia: Reality and Challenges. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 20(2), 175-197. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1359623.pdf

Alquraini, T. A., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Assessing teachers’ knowledge, readiness, and needs to implement Universal Design for Learning in classrooms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1452298

Barteaux, S. (2014). Universal Design for Learning. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 6(2), 50-54. https://www.brandonu.ca/master-education/journal/

Boothe, D., Chitiyo, M., Carlson, M., & Goodwin, J. (2018). Understanding UDL in Higher Education: A Case Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–15. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0097-1

Cairns-Lee, H., Lawley, J., & Tosey, P. (2022). Eliciting Interview Data Cleanly Through Minimising Leading Questions. In Clean Language Interviewing: Principles and applications for researchers and practitioners (pp. 17-30). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211037446

CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: CAST.

Chita-Tegmark, M., Kolacz, J., & Jorgensen, M. (2012). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Research Review and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 51–60. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700305

Delaney, T. A., & Hata, M. (2020). Universal design for learning in assessment: Supporting ELLs with learning disabilities. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.1.5

Evans, C., Williams, J. B., King, L., & Metcalf, D. (2010). Modeling, guided instruction, and application of UDL in a rural special education teacher preparation program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 29(4), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051002900409

Fuentes, S. S., Castro, L., Casas, J. A., Vallejo, V., & Zuñiga, D. (2016). Teacher perceptions based on universal design for learning. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids, 4, 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000155

Hartmann, E. (2015). Universal design for learning (UDL) and learners with severe support needs. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 54-67.

Izzo, M. V., & Bauer, A. M. (2015). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and the Flipped Classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 245–260.

Katz, J., & Sugden, R. (2013). The Three-Block Model of Universal Design for Learning Implementation in a High School. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (141), 1-28.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1008728.pdf

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444 https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-330-820221002

McLeskey, J., Barringer, M-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.

Melhem, T., & Al-Rashid, W. (2023). Teachers’ perception towards implementation of principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in teaching students with learning difficulties. Kuwait University Educational Journal, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v29i4.772

Kirsch, B. A., & Luo, T. (2023). Universal Design for Learning Implementation in Higher Education: Survey of Faculty and Instructional Designers. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design: December 2023, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.59668/806.13414

Rose, D. H., & Strangman, N. (2007). Universal Design for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Individual Learning Differences Through a Neurocognitive Perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 381–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0062-8

Rose, D. H., Harbour, W. S., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S. G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of postsecondary education and disability, 19(2), 135-151. http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

Rose, D. H., Hasselbring, T. S., Stahl, S., & Zabala, J. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. Handbook of special education technology research and practice, 507-518. http://smcmtechintheclassroom.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/86565400/AT_UDL.pdf

Almutairi, N., & Alsuwayl, A. (2023). Assessing the knowledge of elementary school teachers on universal design for learning in Saudi Arabia. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2270295. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2270295

Kim, S., & Slapac, A. (2015). Culturally Responsive, Transformative Pedagogy in the Transnational Era: Critical Perspectives. Educational Studies, 51(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.983639

Zhang, L., Carter Jr, R. A., Greene, J. A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2024). Unraveling challenges with the implementation of universal design for learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 35. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-024-09860-7

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30