The Understanding of Contemporary Vocal Pedagogy and the Teaching Methods of Internationally Acclaimed Vocal Coaches
Keywords:
Contemporary Commercial Singing; Vocal Education; Singing; Popular MusicAbstract
As a result of the growing interest in Contemporary
Commercial Music (CCM) singing, and increasing interest in TV shows
such as ‘The Voice, ‘X-Factor’ and ‘American Idol’, many singers are
realising the importance of developing a strong vocal technique.
Lack of scientific understanding and poor kinaesthetic awareness in the
past, has meant that singing pedagogies have relied on the use of
imagery and on the sensations of singers and teachers (Morris, 2012,
Chapman, 2006). In the 21st century, however, scientific understanding
and knowledge about the voice, as well as a great tradition of imagery
and sensation based pedagogies, has led to a great deal of disagreement
about the best method to approach the teaching of singing. Vocal music
is a broad field and incorporates many genres. Voice qualities vary
greatly between these styles and are very different from classical singing
(Bjorkner, 2008, p. 533), which has been the predominant style of tuition
until relatively recently. The difference in voice quality between classical
and CCM styles has raised issues about the nature of appropriate
teaching for CCM. Some have argued that different techniques are
needed for learning to sing CCM and that classical tuition is not
appropriate. The research reported in this project aims to develop
further understanding of pedagogy as it applies to CCM by
interviewing ten internationally acclaimed vocal coaches as well as
finding out what approach they would have to addressing the vocal
issues of two singing students shown to them on video.
Epistemologically, this research adopted a phenomenological approach
and used semi-structured interviews. The research generated many
specific lessons for vocal pedagogy. It has shown: teachers must base
their teaching on an in depth understanding of how the vocal
mechanism works rather than just teaching how they were taught. They
must tailor their teaching to the individual needs of students, as well as
stay up to date with the latest developments in vocal pedagogy; that
there are differences between teaching singing in the classical and CCM
styles; that learning about specific styles requires specific training.
Teachers should also have professional performance experience; always
support and encourage students; and help their students to understand
how to connect with a song and perform with emotional awareness.
Education is ultimately concerned with the improvement of practice.
My aim is that this study contributes to the development and re-evaluation of the teaching and learning of CCM singing in Ireland and
provides a strong and comprehensive vocal methodology.
References
Bjorkner, E. (2008). Musical Theater and Opera Singing—Why So Different? A Study of Subglottal Pressure, Voice Source, and Formant Frequency Characteristics. Journal of Voice, 22 (5).
Chapman, J. (2006). Singing and Teaching Singing - A Holistic Approach to Classical Voice. Plural Publishing.
Chandler, K. (2014). Teaching Popular Music Styles, in Harrison, S. D & O’ Bryan J. (eds) Teaching Singing in the 21st Century. Springer.
Deva, J. (n.d.). Classical vs. Contemporary Vocal Technique, retrieved July 15th, 2014 from http://www.jeanniedeva.com/page/226328
Edwin, R. (1998). Belting 101: Part two. Journal of Singing 55(2), 61–62.
Edwin, R. (2002). Belting: bel canto or brutto canto. Journal of Singing, 58, 67–68.
Edwin, R. (2003). A Broader Broadway. Journal of Singing, 59 (5).
Edwin, R. (2004). Belt yourself. Journal of Singing, 60, 285–288.
Edwin, R. (2005). Contemporary Music Theatre: Louder Than Words. Journal of Singing, 61 (3), 291-292.
Love, R. (1999). Set Your Voice Free: How to get the singing or speaking voice you want. Little, Brown & Company.
LoVetri, J. (2014, January 9). Specific Training for Specific Styles. Retrieved April 16th, 2014 from http://somaticvoicework.com/specific-training-for-specific-styles/
Morris, R. (2012). The Effects of Accent Method Breathing on the Development of Young Classical Singers. Retrieved July 3rd, 2014 from https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/31c9fb59-1bd6-735b-be96-6f04fb955a52/1/Morris_2013_02Thesis.pdf
Roth, W.M. (2009). Epistemic mediation: Video data as filters for the objectification of teaching by teachers, in Goldman, R., Pea, R, Barron and Derry (2006) Video Research in the learning sciences. Routledge: New York, 367-382.
Riggs, S. (2008). Singing for the Stars. Alfred Music.
Seminatore, G. (2010). Teaching Poetry through Song: A Modest Proposal. Journal of Singing, 66(5), 515-525.
Speed, A. (2012). The Estill Model. Retrieved January 8th, 2014 from http://www.thevoiceexplained.com/content/brief-overview-estill-model
Spivey, N. 2008. Music Theatre Singing. let’s talk. Part 2: Examining the Debate on Belting. Journal of Singing, 64 (5), 607–611.
Thurman, L. (2004). Myth-Conceptions? About Breathing for Singing and Speaking. Australian Voice, 10, 28-37.
Williams, J. (2013). Teaching Singing to Children and Young Adults. Compton Publishing Limited.
Wormhoudt, P. S. (2001). With a Song in My Psyche: On the Psychology of Singing and Teaching Singing. Xlibris. Retrieved April 15th, 2014 from http://www.anats.org.au/data/AUSVOICE/2004_AV10.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Trish Julie Rooney

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).