Exploring the Impact of Individual Differences on the Knowledge Construction Process of Chinese College Students
Keywords:
Individual differences; cognitive strategies; knowledge construction; cognitive loadAbstract
The current research explored how individual differences in learning motivation and cognitive strategies affect the process of knowledge construction of Chinese college students. Previous studies explored these factors separately and failed to scrutinize their interaction effects and the effect of technology. This study further focused on how such differences collectively influence learning behaviours and outcomes and provide implications for designing personalized educational strategy development. A qualitative approach was utilized through semi-structured interviews with 20 students across diverse academic disciplines. Data were analysed using thematic analysis in search of patterns related to learning challenges, motivational drivers, and cognitive strategies. Results showed that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations seem to be vital in driving engagement in learning, and cognitive flexibility together with reflective practices supported deeper knowledge construction. Besides, students often resorted to technological tools, such as online platforms and AI-driven applications, in overcoming challenges and enhanced strategies. This research throws new light on the interaction of motivation, cognitive strategies, and technology for bridging gaps that are critical in research findings in this area and has underlined the integral involvement of these factors in bringing about an improvement in education quality.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.25
References
Alamri, W. A. (2019). Effectiveness of qualitative research methods: Interviews and diaries. International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijecs.v2i1.4302
Aung, K. T., Razak, R. A., & Nazry, N. N. M. (2021). Establishing validity and reliability of semi-structured interview questionnaire in developing risk communication module: A pilot study. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 600-606. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i3.177
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
Bagaskara, A., Nur, T., Herdiana, Y., et al. (2022). Teacher's strategy in improving student's learning motivation. Al-Ibda: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(2), Article 245. https://doi.org/10.54892/jpgmi.v2i02.245
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Cao, C., & Meng, Q. (2022). A systematic review of predictors of international students’ cross-cultural adjustment in China: current knowledge and agenda for future research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(1), 45-67.
Civitillo, S., Juang, L. P., Badra, M., & Schachner, M. K. (2019). The interplay between culturally responsive teaching, cultural diversity beliefs, and self-reflection: A multiple case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.002
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. 7th Edition. Routledge.
Dinsmore, D. L., & Fryer, L. K. (2019). Developing learners’ cognitive strategies and the motivation to use them: Rethinking education policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219860862
Do, H. N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? Heliyon, 9(12), e22862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862
Forsberg, A., Adams, E. J., & Cowan, N. (2021). The role of working memory in long-term learning: Implications for childhood development. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 74, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2021.02.001
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Goodman, L. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
Habók, A., Kong, Y., Ragchaa, J., & Magyar, A. (2021). Cross-cultural differences in foreign language learning strategy preferences among Hungarian, Chinese and Mongolian University students. Heliyon, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06505
Hellín, C. J., Calles-Esteban, F., Valledor, A., Gómez, J., Oton-Tortosa, S., & Tayebi, A. (2023). Enhancing student motivation and engagement through a gamified learning environment. Sustainability, 15(19), Article 14119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914119
Huang, Y. (2023). Exam-Oriented Education and Quality-Oriented Education in China: A Comparative Analysis Taking English Education as an Example. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2023). https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/36/20240439
Huang, R., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Lu, H., & Gao, B. (2020). New forms of teaching in future education: Flexible teaching and active learning. Modern Distance Education Research, 32(3), 3-14.
Huang, Y., & Sui, H. (2021). The impact of teacher support on students' motivation in learning English as a foreign language: A self-determination theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820938810
Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts in qualitative research methodology: Participant observation and interview process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.2.2.202109.5
Kleimola, R., Hirsto, L., & Ruokamo, H. (2024). Promoting higher education students’ self-regulated learning through learning analytics: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12978-4
Lanka E., V Lanka S. & Singh P. (2021). Why We Need Qualitative Research in Management Studies. Research gate. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(2), e200297. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200297.en
Mohd, A., Ismail, I., & Sivakumaran, V. (2025). Revolutionizing education with artificial intelligence (AI): Challenges and implications for open and distance learning (ODL). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101308
Patac, L. P., & Patac Jr, A. V. (2025). Using ChatGPT for academic support: Managing cognitive load and enhancing learning efficiency–A phenomenological approach. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101301.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101301
Peel, K. L. (2020). A beginner’s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/ryr5-k983
Rasli, A., Tee, M., Lai, Y. L., Tiu, Z. C., & Soon, E. H. (2022). Post-COVID-19 strategies for higher education institutions dealing with unknown and uncertainties. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.992063
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. R. (2019). A teacher-focused intervention to enhance students' classroom engagement: Integrating self-determination theory and teacher-student interaction theories. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 87–102). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00007-3
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Shaw, D. J., Czekóová, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A. W., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M., … Urbánek, T. (2018). You ? me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
Silvennoinen, M., Parviainen, T., Malinen, A., Karjalainen, S., Manu, M., & Vesisenaho, M. (2022). Combining physiological and experiential measures to study the adult learning experience. In Goller, M., Kyndt, E., Paloniemi, S., & Dam?a, C. (Eds.), Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development (pp. 137–164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_7
a. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
b. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Taddese, E. T., Gebresilase, B. M., Aboudahr, S. M. F. M., Dinsa, M. T., & Aslam, S. (2025). The practice of inclusive education in Central Ethiopia Regional State: A case study of primary schools. Education 3-13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2449462
Tlili, A., Sun, T., Denden, M., Graf, S., Fei, C., & Wang, H. (2023). Impact of personality traits on learners’ navigational behavior patterns in an online course: A lag sequential analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1071985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071985
Ugwu, C. N., & Eze, V. H. U. (2023). Qualitative research. IDOSR Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 20–35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367204694_Qualitative_Research
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zaini, M. K. (2023). Gamification equilibrium: The fulcrum for balanced intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards in learning systems: Immersive gamification in learning systems. International Journal of Serious Games, 10(3), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v10i3.633
Zhu, Y., Xu, S., Wang, W., Liu, D., & Zhang, X. (2022). The impact of online and offline learning motivation on learning performance: The mediating role of positive academic emotion. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8921–8938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10961-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Liu Junfeng, Phawani Vijayaratnam, Maya Shakiyeva, Bereket Merkine Gebresilase, Subashini K Rajanthran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
