Exploring Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Reflections in Lesson Planning with Generative Artificial Intelligence
Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence; pre-service mathematics teachers; lesson planning; reflective practice; human oversightAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds transformative potential for education, yet its integration by pre-service mathematics teachers in resource-constrained contexts, such as the Philippines, remains underexplored. This qualitative study investigates 30 first-year pre-service mathematics teachers’ reflections on their use of GenAI tools (ChatGPT-4, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Perplexity AI) for lesson planning. Guided by Schön’s (1983) reflective practice framework, it addresses: (1) How do pre-service teachers engage in reflection-in-action during GenAI use? (2) What insights emerge from reflection-on-action after completing AI-assisted lesson plans? Reflexive Thematic Analysis of data from individual written reflections, group observation logs, and final drafts of lesson plans revealed five themes: streamlining planning and stimulating creativity; fostering comparative tool literacy in GenAI integration; emphasizing prompt precision and instructional clarity; negotiating AI outputs via pedagogical judgment; and developing confidence as novice lesson designers. While GenAI enhances efficiency and innovation, participants stressed the need for human oversight to ensure curricular alignment, accurate and factual information, and ethical practice. Findings highlight the need for teacher education programs to incorporate training in prompt engineering, critical AI evaluation, and ethical reflection, equipping pre-service teachers for responsible GenAI use. Additionally, the study advocates for AI policy development to guide pre-service teachers in integrating GenAI into evolving educational landscapes.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.11.16
References
Akmal, S., Fitriah, F., & Fadhilah, I. (2022). The challenges and strategies of Islamic school mentor teachers in implementing ELT lesson plans. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(3), 926–947. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i3.23063
Aljamaan, F., Temsah, M. H., Altamimi, I., Al-Eyadhy, A., Jamal, A., Alhasan, K., Mesallam, T. A., Farahat, M., & Malki, K. H. (2024). Reference hallucination score for medical artificial intelligence chatbots: Development and usability study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e54345. https://doi.org/10.2196/54345
Almuqayteeb, T. A. (2025). The effectiveness of using GenAI tools for developing digital learning resources: Evidence from educators’ perceptions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(4), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.2
Alrwaished, N. (2024). Mathematics pre-service teachers’ preparation program for designing STEM based lesson plan: Enhanced skills and challenges. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2320467. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2320467
Antonio, M. S. M., Sánchez, C. A., & Oscar, M. R. (2024). AI-Driven innovations in higher education: Improving lesson planning and teaching quality at UABC. In 2024 IEEE 42nd Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XLII) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONCAPAN63470.2024.10933906
Asfeldt, M., & Stonehouse, P. (2021). On becoming a reflective practitioner. In G. Thomas, J. Dyment, & H. Prince (Eds.), Outdoor environmental education in higher education. International explorations in outdoor and environmental education (Vol. 9, pp. 337-348). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75980-3_28
Ayoobiyan, H., & Rashidi, N. (2021). Can reflective teaching promote resilience among Iranian EFL teachers? A mixed-method design. Reflective Practice, 22(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1873758
Bongala, J. V., Bobis, V. B., Castillo, J. P. R., & Marasigan, A. C. (2020). Pedagogical strategies and challenges of multigrade schoolteachers in Albay, Philippines. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 22(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2019-0037
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, M. N. Coutanche, L. M. McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & S. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (2nd ed., pp. 65-81). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-004
Cain, W. (2024). Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education. TechTrends, 68(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0
Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Cengiz, B. C., & Kaçar, I. G. (2024). Pre-service EFL teachers’ online language teaching and their TPACK development. Novitas-ROYAL, 18(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10972972
Cevikbas, M., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2024). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: Recent developments. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2
Commission on Higher Education. (2017). Revised policies, standards and guidelines for Bachelor of Secondary Education (CMO No. 75, s. 2017). https://ched.gov.ph/2017-ched-memorandum-orders/
Cui, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Can student accurately identify artificial intelligence-generated content? An exploration of AIGC credibility from user perspective in education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13448-1
Department of Education. (2021). MATATAG Mathematics CG Grades 1, 4, and 7. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/matatag-mathematics-cg-grades1-4-and-7/
Diseth, Å. (2025). Reflection notes as a tool for professional development of pre-service psychology teachers. Reflective Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2025.2504139
ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926
Fuego, M. R. B., & de Leon, R. C. A. (2025). A thematic analysis of pre-service teachers’ reflection on designing and implementing behavioral interventions. Reflective Practice, 26(4), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2025.2494315
Gupta, A. (2024). Impact of generative AI in transforming higher education pedagogy. In Leveraging ChatGPT and artificial intelligence for effective customer engagement (pp. 285–300). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0815-8.ch017
Gurl, T. J., Markinson, M. P., & Artzt, A. F. (2025). Using ChatGPT as a lesson planning assistant with preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 11, 114–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00162-9
Jain, S. (2024). A comparative assessment of advanced conversational agents: A multifaceted evaluation of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 14(02), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0224_07
Kalenda, P. J., Rath, L., Abugasea Heidt, M., & Wright, A. (2024). Pre-service teacher perceptions of ChatGPT for lesson plan generation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 53(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241301388
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, R., Groh, L., Hagenhofer, D., Hammer, S., Hillermeier, D., Kaiser, D., Kienle, A., Klinger, P., Lang, C., Leichner, M., Pielmeier, S., Reichart, J., Sachse, L., … Zürn, J. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
K?l?ç, S. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in teaching different disciplines. In Interdisciplinary approach to fostering change in schools. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4119-3.ch009
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Kola, M. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ action research: Technology education lesson planning in a South African university. Educational Action Research, 29(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1686043
Lefebvre, J., Lefebvre, H., Gauvin-Lepage, J., Gosselin, R., & Lecocq, D. (2023). Reflection on teaching action and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134, 104305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104305
Liu, Y., & Trent, J. (2023). Teacher identity in reform contexts: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 126, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104019
Makarenko, O., Borysenko, O., Horokhivska, T., Kozub, V., & Yaremenko, D. (2024). Embracing artificial intelligence in education: Shaping the learning path for future professionals. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, e2024ss0720. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0720
Muncey, T. (2024). Generative AI and the shifting boundaries of teacher identity. Journal of Educational Change, 25(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09456-1
Neokleous, G., & Krulatz, A. (2020). Intercepting and fluid identities: From reflective teacher educators to reflective teachers. In Language teacher identity in TESOL: Teacher education and practice as identity work (pp. 231–249). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429342875-19
Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., Syamsi, K., Mutiaraningrum, I., & Wulandari, F. D. (2024). Teacher’s experience using ChatGPT in language teaching: An exploratory study. Computers in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2441161
Pham, H. T. T., Le, N. M. T., Doan, H. T. T., & Luong, H. T. (2023). Examining Philology teachers' lesson planning competencies in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.7
Powell, W., & Courchesne, S. (2024). Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PLoS ONE, 19(6), e0305337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305337
Pramoolsook, I., & Magday, W. D., Jr. (2019). Move confirmation and teaching strategy identification of English student-teachers’ lesson plans in the Philippines: A rhetorical framework for novice teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 150-173. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.10
Ramos, R. F., De Angel, R. M., Ruetas, A. P., Enrile, J. C., Calimbo, A. L., & Vargas, P. C. (2024). Impact assessment of ChatGPT and AI technologies integration in student learning: An analysis for academic policy formulation. In 2024 6th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Education (WAIE) (pp. 87-92). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WAIE63876.2024.00023
Santos, R. M., & Villanueva, M. A. (2023). Prompt engineering as reflective practice: Filipino teachers’ experiences with GenAI in assessment design. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(11), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.6
Sari, Y. R., Drajati, N. A., So, H.-J., & Sumardi. (2021). Enhancing EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) competence through reflective practice. Teflin Journal, 32(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i1/117-133
Savage, J. (2014). Lesson planning: Key concepts and skills for teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765181
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1992). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Sehweil, M., Mahmoud, S., & Jeidi, M. (2022). The importance of the lesson plan elements in education and teachers’ practices of them. In D. Burgos & S. Affouneh (Eds.), Radical solutions in Palestinian higher education (Chapter 8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0101-0_8
Shukla, M., Goyal, I., Gupta, B., & Sharma, J. (2024). A comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, 12(4), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.4.2
Siiman, L. A. (2024). AI in teacher education: An introductory training session for pre-service teachers involving Microsoft Copilot. In Innovative technologies and learning (Chapter 24). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65884-6_24
?al?, M. L., Müller, C. N., Alb?stroiu N?stase, I., State, O., & Gheorghe, G. (2024). Exploring university students' perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in education. Amfiteatru Economic, 26(65), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2024/65/71
Ta?abat, S. E. (2025). The revolution of generative AI. In S. Benziane & F. Guerroudji Meddah (Eds.), Neural network advancements in the age of AI (pp. 149-178). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0735-0.ch004
Tassoti, S. (2024). Assessment of student’s use of generative artificial intelligence: Prompting strategies and prompt engineering in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(6), 2475-2482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00212
Valdez, P. N., Lapinid, M. R., & Chua, V. C. (2024). Agency at work: A metaphor analysis of lesson planning among English language teachers in the Philippines. TEFLIN Journal, 35(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i2/352-369
World Bank. (2020). Primary education, teachers (% female) - Philippines. Retrieved August 30, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS?locations=PH
Yanar, A. N., & Ergene, Ö. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in education: How pre-service mathematics teachers use ChatGPT for 5E lesson plan design. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202533163
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sybel Joy Farillon Labis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
