Teachers’ Sensemaking, Agency and the Implementation of Core Competencies: Lessons from Ghana’s Competency-based Mathematics Curriculum Reform
Keywords:
Competency-based curriculum reform; Core competencies; Teacher sensemaking; Implementation realism; Junior high mathematicsAbstract
Core competencies, understood as the essential capabilities learners must develop to participate effectively in contemporary society, lie at the centre of competency-based reforms worldwide, yet many education systems struggle to realise this vision in classroom practice. This study examines how junior high mathematics teachers and curriculum developers in Ghana make sense of, and work with, these competencies. A qualitative multiple case study was conducted through interviews with six teachers and three curriculum developers and classroom observations of three teachers. Drawing on sensemaking, teacher agency, and implementation realism, the analysis explores how actors respectively interpret policy messages, exercise instructional choice, and judge what is feasible in context. Our analysis shows that while critical thinking is widely regarded as integral to mathematics, competencies such as digital literacy and cultural identity remain marginal or are viewed as difficult to embed in lessons. Teachers report using learner-centred strategies, including group work and contextual tasks, but these are constrained by perceived curriculum overload, high-stakes examination pressures, and limited resources and professional learning. The study provides an in-depth qualitative account of how core competencies are prioritised, adapted, and constrained in practice, extending existing work on teacher sensemaking in competency-based reforms in low- and middle-income contexts. Bridging curriculum aspirations and classroom realities requires sustained subject-specific professional learning, better alignment of assessment with competency goals, and stronger teacher participation in curriculum design and review.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.1.30
References
Aboagye, E., & Yawson, J. A. (2020). Teachers’ perception of the new educational curriculum in Ghana. African Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 6-12.
Addai-Mununkum, R., & Setordzi, S. (2023). Implementing curriculum change in Ghana: Exploring teachers’ experiences with enacting 21st-century pedagogies. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(4), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13660
Adekanbi, I. T. A., & Oladele, M. T. (2024). Curriculum theory: Empowering teachers in delivering effective teaching for children’s holistic development. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 3(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v3i2.70214
Akinrinola, F., Ogegbo, A., Emmanuel, A., & Adewusi, A. (2021). Competency-based education in Africa: Exploring teachers’ perceptions, understanding, and practices. Teacher Education through Flexible Learning in Africa, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.35293/tetfle.v2i1.86
Allen, C. D. (2023). “Figuring out my part in all of this”: Understanding ambiguity and uncertainty in shaping teacher learning within reform. American Journal of Education, 130(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1086/727005
Allen, C. D., & Heredia, S. C. (2020). Reframing organizational contexts from barriers to levers for teacher learning in science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1794292
Anhalt, C. O., Cortez, R., & Bennett, A. B. (2018). The Emergence of Mathematical Modeling Competencies: An Investigation of Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1474532
Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High?stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.002 SCIRP+1
Braskén, M., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2019). Implementing a Multidisciplinary Curriculum in a Finnish Lower Secondary School – The Perspective of Science and Mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1623311
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N., & Sherer, D. G. (2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567
Buenrostro, P. M., & Ehrenfeld, N. (2023). Beyond mere persistence: A conceptual framework for bridging perseverance and mathematical sensemaking in teaching and teacher learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10240-1
Bümen, N., & Holmqvist, M. (2022). Teachers’ sensemaking and adapting of the national curriculum: A multiple case study in Turkish and Swedish contexts. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(6), 832–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2121178
Cajandig, A., & Ledesma, Z. (2025). The synergy between 21st-century skills and mathematical proficiency. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400108
Cameron, T. (2020). An investigation into factors influencing teachers’ implementation of curriculum reform: A framework for successful implementation. Journal of Education and Development in the Caribbean, 19(1), 144-168. https://doi.org/10.46425/j119016397
Chen, D., Chen, Y., & Chi, J. (2024). Early childhood teachers amid China’s curriculum reforms: From a literature review. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-024-00135-w
Chimbunde, P., & Moreeng, B. B. (2024). The sustainability of curriculum reform and implementation through teacher participation: Evidence from social studies teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.6
Cho, Y., & Hong, H. J. (2025). Exploring teaching and learning approaches for competency-based curriculum in elementary and secondary schools: Focusing on the implementation of core projects. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 25(3), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.3.67
Christopher, M., & Jones, M. (2024). Evaluating contexts for implementing a competency-based curriculum in South and Eastern Africa: A meta-narrative review. Curriculum Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.301
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Danquah, E., & Poku, E. D. (2024). Experiences of Teachers Implementing the Standards-Based Curriculum in La-Nkwantanang, Ghana: Should the Experiences be Overlooked? Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.56893/pajes2024v05i01.03
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
De Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Tio, R. A., & Steinert, Y. (2019). Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
Duong, B. H., Dao, V., & DeJaeghere, J. (2022). Complexities in teaching competencies: A longitudinal analysis of Vietnamese teachers’ sensemaking and practices. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2262473
Egara, F., & Mosia, M. (2025). Equipping pre-service mathematics teachers for diverse classrooms: Best practices and innovations. University of the Free State. https://doi.org/10.38140/obp3-2025-09
Ehrenfeld, N. (2023). The role of mathematics teachers’ previous professional experiences in their collaborative sensemaking: An ecological perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09604-4
Engelbrecht, P. (2020). Inclusive education: Developments and challenges in South Africa. Prospects, 49, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09499-6
Fry, K., Nakar, S., & Zorn, K. (2025). Professional learning interventions for inquiry-based pedagogies in primary classrooms: A scoping review (2012–2022). Math Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00516-x
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gong, Y., Fan, C. W., & Wang, C. (2021). Teacher agency in adapting to online teaching during COVID-19: A case study on teachers of Chinese as an additional language in Macau. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 12(1), 82-101. http://www.tclt.us/journal/2021v12n1/gongfanwang.pdf.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Handayani, S., Hussin, M., & Norman, M. (2023). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Model in teaching: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis: Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.19
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation How many interviews are enough. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
Kaya, D., Ya?ar, A., Çetin, ?., & Kutluca, T. (2025). The relationship between the 21st-century skills and computational thinking skills of prospective mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202531498
König, J., Ligtvoet, R., Klemenz, S., & Rothland, M. (2017). Effects of opportunities to learn in teacher preparation on future teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge: Analyzing program characteristics and outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.001
König, J., Ligtvoet, R., Klemenz, S., & Rothland, M. (2021). Effects of opportunities to learn in teacher preparation on future teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge: Analyzing program characteristics and outcomes of teacher education in Germany. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103256
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716
Lai, Y., Strayer, J. F., Ross, A., Adamoah, K., Anhalt, C., Bonnesen, C. T., … & Lischka, A. E. (2023). Enhancing prospective secondary teachers’ potential competence for enacting core teaching practices—through experiences in university mathematics and statistics courses. ZDM – Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01485-4
Lauermann, F., & ten Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ perceived teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355
Lavonen, J. (2021). Educating the educators: Reflecting on teacher education for a 21st-century Finnish school. In: J.C-K. Lee & T. Ehmke (eds.) Quality in Teacher Education and Professional Development (pp. 13–31). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004502522_002
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lowell, B. R., Fogelman, S. E., & McNeill, K. L. (2024). Organizational sensemaking during curriculum implementation: The dilemma of agency, role of collaboration, and importance of discipline-specific leadership. Science Education, 108(5), 1448–1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21885
Luitel, S., Pokharel, M., Sharma, L., Poudel, M., & Sahani, S. K. (2024). Teacher’s mindset and mathematical competencies development: An appraisal of intervention actions for curriculum change adoption. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3468
Marco-Bujosa, L., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2017). An exploration of teacher learning from an educative reform-oriented science curriculum: Case studies of teacher curriculum use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21340
Mateo-Berganza Díaz, M. M., Lim, J. R., Pellicer Iborra, C., López, E., Rodríguez, H., López, R., Magro Mazo, C., Vásquez Guerra, A., Quesada Alvarado, A., Brooks-Young, S., Álvarez, X., Ramos, Y., Rivas, A., Barrenechea, I., Brazão, V., Ndebele, V., Nathan, D., & Groot, B. (2022). The power of curriculum to transform education: How education systems incorporate 21st century skills to prepare students for today’s challenges. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004360
McLure, F. I., & Aldridge, J. M. (2023). Sustaining reform implementation: A systematic literature review. School Leadership & Management, 43(1), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2171012
Moh’d, S. S., Uwamahoro, J., Joachim, N., & Orodho, J. (2021). Assessing the level of secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1977. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10883
Moray, N. (2024). The integration of 21st-century skills in Grade Eight mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n2p271
NaCCA. (2020). Curriculum for junior high school – Common Core Programme: Mathematics syllabus. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Ghana.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Implementation of the competence-based learning in Rwandan physics classrooms: First assessment based on the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1880. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8395
Nihayah, R. W., Dina, W. F., Wijayanti, D., & Asyah, A. N. (2023). How does granting teacher autonomy influence classroom instruction? Lessons from Indonesia’s curriculum reform implementation. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v16i1.768 jpkp.kemendikdasmen.go.id+1
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical Competencies Revisited. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6
Nsengimana, T., Mugabo, L. R., Hiroaki, O., & Nkundabakura, P. (2024). Reflection on science competence-based curriculum implementation in Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Science Education, 47(8), 1071–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2356971
O’Leary, M., Cui, V., Kiem, M. T., Dang, D. T., Nguyen, G. T. H., & Thi Hoang, K. H. (2023). The role of classroom observation in the development and assessment of schoolteachers in Vietnam: a review of national policy and research. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2191307
Orafi, S. M., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.11.004
Ortiz-Laso, Z., Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Lavicza, Z., & Blanco, T. F. (2023). Teacher growth in exploiting mathematics competencies through STEAM projects. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1283-1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01528-w
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills. In: E. Care, P. Griffin & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 21–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Shared Sense-making in Curriculum Reform: Orchestrating the Local Curriculum Work. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1402367
Pino-Fan, L., Castro, W. F., & Font, V. (2022). A macro tool to characterize and develop key competencies for the mathematics teacher’s practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 1407–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10324-z
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: what is it and why does it matter? In: J. Evers & R. Kneyber (Eds.), Flip the System (pp. 134–148). Routledge.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426
Ross, E. (2024). Teachers’ interpretation of curriculum as a window into “curriculum potential.” The Curriculum Journal, 35(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.239
Setordzi, S. (2023). Towards implementing the standards-based curriculum: Exploring teachers’ experiences with developing the core competencies of pupils [Master’s thesis, University of Education, Winneba]. University of Education, Winneba Institutional Repository. http://ir.uew.edu.gh:8080/bitstream/handle/123456789/3494/Towards%20implementing%20the%20standards-based%20curriculum%20exploring%20teachers%e2%80%99%20experiences%20with%20developing%20the%20core%20competencies%20of%20pupils.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Shekar, N. (2025). Transferable skills and English language pedagogy: A contextualized study. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7051
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Sliwka, A., Klopsch, B., Beigel, J., & Tung, L. (2024). Transformational leadership for deeper learning: shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049
So, K., Lee, S., & Choi, Y. (2024). Teachers’ sensemaking of the decentralizing curriculum reform policy: A comparative case study in South Korea. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, 102331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102331
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Tumuheise, A., Ssempala, F., Rwends, F. T., & Nachuha, S. (2023). Factors affecting implementation of competence-based curriculum in selected secondary schools of Kabale Municipality–Kabale District. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 10(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.15739/ijeprr.23.008
Watson, H. R., & Burr, S. (2018). Twelve tips for teaching twelve transferable skills [version 1]. MedEdPublish, 7, 177. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000177.1
Wawire, B. A., Kiambati, F., Muhia, N., Gathoni, G., & Abuya, B. (2025). Competence-based curriculum implementation in Africa: A scoping review of pedagogical and assessment practices. Journal of Curriculum Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2523429
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yan, C. (2012). “We can only change in a small way”: A study of secondary English teachers’ implementation of curriculum reform in China. Journal of Educational Change, 13(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9186-1
Yembergenova, D., Mamadiyar, A., Zhaiyrbayev, S., & Kumar, A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of recent curriculum reforms: A case study on Kazakhstani teachers’ utilisation processes for the new English course plan. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2375083. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2375083
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prince Hamid Armah, Dennis Osei Yeboah, Matilda Sarpong Adusei, Robert Benjamin Armah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
