Bridging Perceptions and Practice: Teachers’ Views and Classroom Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Feedback in University English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing Classes

Authors

  • Susmita Sarker Shuvra
  • Sukanto Roy
  • Poroma Subha Mostafiz

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence; AI-assisted feedback; English as a Foreign Language; higher education; teachers’ perceptions; mixed-method research

Abstract

The rapid development in artificial intelligence has brought significant changes in teaching and learning practices in the context of higher education English as a Foreign Language context. This empirical study focuses on three research questions. These are tertiary-level English teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence assisted feedback, their approaches to incorporating it into teaching, and the challenges they encounter in implementing it in the English as a Foreign Language classroom, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model. Using a mixed-method approach, data were collected from 120 university English teachers via questionnaires. Results show teachers indicate high perceived usefulness (M = 4.13), ease of use (M = 4.10), and overall acceptance (M = 4.08), but lower actual use (M = 3.97). Teachers specifically use artificial intelligence during drafting and revision (M = 3.75), alongside their guidance (M = 3.58). However, the regression analysis (R² = .006) suggests that a positive attitude cannot ensure the successful integration of artificial intelligence in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Barriers such as implicit institutional policy, ethical concerns, limited training opportunities, and students’ overdependency on artificial intelligence tools hinder regular application. These issues are reflected in low monitoring (M = 2.50) and discussing limitations (M = 1.75). Thus, this study highlights the critical gap that remains between teachers’ positive perceptions and practical integration, emphasizing the role of effective pedagogical mediation of artificial intelligence tools.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.5.22

References

Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching–learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

Al Abdullatif, A. M. (2024). Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: The role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111209

Alnemrat, A., Aldamen, H., Almashour, M., Al-Deaibes, M., & AlSharefeen, R. (2025). AI vs. teacher feedback on EFL argumentative writing: A quantitative study. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1614673. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1614673

Alsalem, M. S. (2024). EFL teachers’ perceptions of the use of an AI grading tool (CoGrader) in English writing assessment: An activity theory perspective. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2430865

Asif, M., & Sarwar, F. (2025). The essential position of trust in the technology acceptance model: A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis in management studies. Journal of Modelling in Management, 20(5), 1635–1655. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2023-0282

Ba, S., Yang, L., Yan, Z., Looi, C. K., & Gaševi?, D. (2025). Unraveling the mechanisms and effectiveness of AI-assisted feedback in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100284

Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2017). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275

Bantu, A. F., Kozyra, A., & Wiora, J. (2025). Normality tests for transformed large measured data: A comprehensive analysis. Statistics in Transition New Series, 26(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.59139/stattrans-2025-034

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cabero Almenara, J. (2024). Acceptance of educational artificial intelligence by schoolteachers. Education Sciences, 14(7), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070740

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dorsah, P. (2026). The use of Cronbach’s alpha reliability in educational research: A systematic review. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 4(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2026.4(2).04

Eusebio, E. J. G., Baldera, P. R., Patiam, A. M. C., Villanueva, E. F., Gaa, N. A., Solis, A. M. F., & Ribon, A. L. (2025). AI in the classroom: A systematic review of barriers to educator acceptance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.7

Giac, C. C., Giang, C. T. V., Hoang, L. H., & Ngan, T. T. T. (2025). A study on teachers’ acceptance of digital technology in Vietnamese secondary education: An assessment using the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.3

Gumede, E. N., & Mavuru, L. (2025). Teachers’ understandings and practices of using smartboards as digital tools to teach Grade 12 life sciences genetics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 323-338. http://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.17

Hazzan Bishara, A., Kol, O., & Levy, S. (2025). The factors affecting teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: A unified model of external and internal determinants. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15043–15069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z

Huang, X., Xu, W., Li, F., & Yu, Z. (2024). A meta-analysis of effects of automated writing evaluation on anxiety, motivation, and second language writing skills. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00865-y

Ilmaa, A., & Rohmah, Z. (2025). AI in EFL education: Teachers’ competence and the roadblocks to teaching material development. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2588471. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2588471

Kamath, A., Poojari, S., & Varsha, K. (2025). Assessing the robustness of normality tests under varying skewness and kurtosis: A practical checklist for public health researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25, 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02641-y

Karagoz, I. (2025). AI generated feedback in English writing instruction for language learners: A systematic review. The Reading Matrix, 25(1), 51–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391653663

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Khoso, A. K., Honggang, W., & Darazi, M. A. (2026). Trust and attitude towards AI as pathways to creativity: A TAM model study of EFL students’ digital literacy and AI acceptance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, 69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06362-x

Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3). http://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int

Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(408), 1096. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290095

Lariba, C. F. V., & Ibojo, Ph.D, D. T. M. (2025). Teacher’s attitudes towards the use of AI: A study of benefits, concerns and support needs. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(IIIS), 5871–5876. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0426

Latif, M. W., & Wasim, A. (2024). Investigating EFL instructors’ approaches to classroom based assessment culture: An explanatory sequential mixed method approach. Language Testing in Asia, 14, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00332-x

Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2025). Elucidating university students’ intentions to seek automated writing feedback from Grammarly: Toward perceptual and systemic predictors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03861-1

Matiwane, B. Y., & Olaitan, O. (2025). Critical success factors for integrating AI tools into university curricula for workforce readiness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(8), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.5

Mekheimer, M. (2025). Generative AI assisted feedback and EFL writing: A study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education, 4, 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7

Nguyen, L. T. H., Dinh, H., Dao, T. B. N., & Tran, N. G. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions and students’ strategies in using AI-mediated informal digital learning for career ESL writing. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101414

Ofem, U. J., Orim, F. S., Edam Agbor, I. B., Amanso, E. O. I., Eni, E., Ukatu, J. O., … Abuo, C. B. (2025). Teachers’ preparedness for the utilization of artificial intelligence in classroom assessment: The contributory effects of attitude toward technology, technological readiness, and pedagogical beliefs with perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as mediators. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1568306. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1568306

Ozili, P. K. (2025). Technology impact model: A transition from the technology acceptance model. AI & Society, 40(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01896-1

Runge, I., Hebibi, F., & Lazarides, R. (2025). Acceptance of pre service teachers towards artificial intelligence (AI): The role of AI related teacher training courses and AI TPACK within the Technology Acceptance Model. Education Sciences, 15(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020167

Sari, W. D. (2025). Exploring teacher perceptions of deep learning for professional development: A technology acceptance model approach. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP), 31(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v31i12025p115-124

Sharmin, L., Kalima, R., Imran, M., Chauca, M., & Balladares, J. (2026). Teachers’ perceptions of AI in supporting students’ learning within a globally diverse digital setting. Discover Education, 5, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01089-y

Sharmithashini, M., & Hashim, H. (2025). Sustaining ESL writing development with AI driven automated feedback systems: A systematic review (2006–2025). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(8), 531–550. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.908000041

Sholikhah, S. S., Zamzami, N., & Sulistyaningsih. (2025). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in learning activities. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology, 4(3), 1474–1482. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v4i3.318

Silor, A. C., & Silor, F. S. (2025). Boosting reading comprehension through AI-based learning tools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.4

Sulewski, P. (2024). Goodness-of-fit testing for normality where alternative distributions have undefined or constant skewness and excess kurtosis. Wiadomo?ci Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, 69(9), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.59139/ws.2024.09.1

Syafei, M., & Nuraeningsih, N. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence in writing: ELT students’ perspectives and experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.22

Tran, T. T. T. (2025). Enhancing EFL writing revision practices: The impact of AI- and teacher-generated feedback and their sequences. Education Sciences, 15(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020232

Urzúa, C. A. C., Ranjan, R., Saavedra, E. E. M., Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Lepe-Martínez, N., & Philominraj, A. (2025). Effects of AI-assisted feedback via generative chat on academic writing in higher education students: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101396

Uygun, D. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005

Vallespir-Antillón, M., Comas-Forgas, R., Touza Garma, C., & Espiñeira Bellón, E. M. (2025). Academic integrity in teacher education in the GenAI era: Academic coordinators’ perspectives in Spain. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.8

Xue, L., Ghazali, N., & Mahat, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among teachers: A systematic review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(3), 802–824. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1191

Xue, L., Mahat, J., & Ghazali, N. (2026). Technology acceptance model in artificial intelligence in education: A meta-analysis. SAGE Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251409441

Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of AI educational learning tools: An exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Future Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.65

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, J. M., & Liu, J. B. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542

Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). The effect of feedback on metacognitive strategy use in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6), 1198–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2069822

Zhang, K. (2025). Enhancing critical writing through AI feedback: A randomized control study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050600

Zhang, Z. (2025). The role of generative AI and hybrid feedback in improving L2 academic writing skills. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2503890

Zhang, N., Wong, W. L., & Barrot, J. (2025). Primary teachers’ acceptance and sustained adoption of AI powered learner corpora for writing instruction through TAM and ECM perspectives. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 37399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21205-0

Zhang, Y., & Samsudin, M. A. (2026). From familiarity to criticality: Cultivating EFL teachers’ AI literacy through an AI integrated genre based pedagogy. Education Sciences, 16(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010150

Zhao, C. (2024). AI-assisted assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 6(4), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v6i4.209

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Shuvra, S. S. ., Roy, . S. ., & Mostafiz, P. S. . (2026). Bridging Perceptions and Practice: Teachers’ Views and Classroom Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Supported Feedback in University English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing Classes. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(5), 498–528. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2863

Issue

Section

Articles