How Home Economics Teachers in Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools Implement Sustainability in their Teaching?

Authors

  • Else Marie Øvrebø

Keywords:

Sustainability, Home Economics, teaching, secondary school

Abstract

Sustainability is an aim in the curriculum for Home Economics and
the concept should be familiar to teachers of the subject. The objective of this
study was to investigate how Home Economics teachers in lower secondary
school implement sustainability in their teaching. Secondary school teachers
(n= 30) were interviewed about teaching sustainability in their schools. The
teachers carried out some degree of theoretical teaching about sustainable
development. In the course of practical cookery lessons, their focus on the
sustainability of resources was minimal. Although several teachers wanted to
buy more sustainable products, the budget did not allow it. The majority of
teachers exhibited a relatively low degree of awareness pertaining to the
concept of sustainable food production. Practical application of this concept
was most probably neglected in Home Economics for economic reasons.

References

Aarek, I., & Ask, A. (2012). Sustainable in Home Economics/Food and Health in Norway.

Paper presented at the International Federation for Home Economics World Congress,

Melbourne.

Ask, A.M., Bjerketvedt, N.M., & Jensen, I.L. (2006a). Matlyst: Mat og Helse for Ungdomstrinnet.

[Appetite: Food and Health for lower secondary schools; in Norwegian].Oslo:

Samlaget.

Caldwell, K. (1997). Ideological influences on curriculum development in nurse education.

Nurse Education Today, 17, 140-144.

Directorate of Health. (2011). New Dietary Advice Can Prevent Lifestyle Diseases. Oslo,

Norway: Directorate of Health.

Giorgi A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In: Giorgi A, ed.

Phenomenology and Psychological Research (pp. 8–22). Pittsburgh, Pa: Duquesne

University Press.

Gough, A. (2005). Sustainable schools: renovating educational processes. Applied

Environmental Education and Communication, 4, 339-351.

Holmboe-Ottesen, G. (2004). Bedre helse med økologisk mat. Tidsskrift for Den norske

legeforeningen, 124(11), 1529-1531.

Holthe, A. (2009). Fra sentral plan til lokale planer i mat og helse. In: A. Holthe, & B.U.

Wilhelmsen (Eds). Mat og Helse i Skolen (pp.23-35). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget

Husjord, L. (2001) Heimkunnskapsfagets Identitet og Appell [Master in Food, Nutrition and

Health]. University of Akershus.

Haapala, I., Biggs, S., Cederberg, R., & Kosonen, A.L. (2012). Home Economics teachers‟

intention and engagement in teaching sustainable development. Scandinavian Journal

of Educational Research, 1, 1-14.

Joa, B.K. (2011). A Sustainable School Kitchen? A Study of Food - and Health Teachers in

Secondary Schools‟ Teaching Strategies about the Theme "Project be Truly Sustainable"

[Master in Food, Nutrition and Health]. University of Oslo and Akershus.

Kleppang, A.L. (2009). Mat og helse i den naturlige skolesekken. [ Food and health in the

natural schoolbag; in Norwegian].

http://www.natursekken.no/c1188058/artikkel/vis.html?tid=1212858&within_tid=1212851.

Knizek, B.L. (1998). Inerview – design og persektiv. In: Lorensen M, ed. The Question

Determines the Method. Research Methods for Nursing and Other Health

Sciences(pp33-64). Oslo: Norwegian Gyldendal Publishing Co,

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Malterud, K. (2003). Kvalitative Metoder i Medisinsk Forskning: En Innføring. 2.utg.

[Qualitative Methods in Medical Research: An Introduction. 2.nd.rev. ed.; in

Norwegian]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Milford, A. B. (2009). Bærekraftig og etisk mat. In: A. Holthe, & B.U. Wilhelmsen (Eds). Mat og

Helse i Skolen (pp: 144-156). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

Murdoch, J. & Miele, M. (2004). A new aesthetic of food? Relational reflexivity in the

'alternative' food movement. Pp.156-175 in M. Harvey, A. McMeekin and A.Warde

(eds.) Qualities of Food. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2002). National Strategy for Sustainable Development (in

Norwegian). Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Ministry of Education. (2006). Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion. Temporary release in

June 2006, Oslo: Gyldendal Publishing Co.

Møller, J. (2009). Skoleledere som fanebærere. Bedre skole, 3, 9-16.

Nymoen, L., Bere, E., Haugen, M., & Meltzer, H. (2009). Diet and sustainable evolution - how

can we as professionals contribute that people eat more green? Norwegian Journal of

Nutrition, 2, 4-12.

Olsen, D.Ø. (2010). Crisis in school kitchens. Oslo: Newswire. http://www.fosnafolket.no/incoming/article1256760.ece. ISSN 1501-8962 No. 77. Accessed August 18.

PERL Conference. (2011). -Enabling-Responsible-Living.

http://www.perlprojects.org/Project-sites/PERL/News-Events/PERL-internationalconferences/PERL-conference-2011-Enabling-Responsible-Living.

Pettersen, S. (2007). Health Claims and Scientific Knowledge. A Study of how Students of

Health Sciences, their Teachers, and Newspaper Journalists Relate to Health Claims in

Society. (Doctoral Thesis). Oslo: Faculty of Education, University of Oslo. Unipub.

Report No. 22. (2011). Motivation-Coping-Secondary Opportunities. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of

Education.

Raabs, N.K. (2010). No Child in the Norwegian Woods. Oslo: Universitetet.

Solheim, T. (2009). Opplæring i yrkesfag. Teori – praksis. Bedre skole, 4, 27-30.

Thommessen, M., Arsky, G.H., & Borschenius, C (2006). Takk for Mat!: Mat og Helse for

Ungdomstrinnet. [Thanks for the food!: Food and Health for lower secondary schools;

in Norwegian]. Oslo: Damm.

Øvrebø, E.M. (2008). Fagdidaktikk i mat og helse. [Didactics in Food and Health; in

Norwegian]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.

Øvrebø, E.M. (2011). Food habits of school pupils in Tromsø, Norway, in the transition from 13

to 15 years of age. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 520-528.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-28