Physical Sciences Learners' Understanding and Experiences of Formative Assessment in Classroom Practice
Keywords:
Formative Assessment; Physical Sciences; Learner Understanding; Classroom Practice; Learner Experiences; FeedbackAbstract
Formative assessment has gained increasing attention in recent educational discourse due to its potential to enhance learning by providing timely and constructive feedback. However, there remains a limited understanding of how learners themselves experience and interpret formative assessment, particularly within under-resourced contexts. This qualitative study investigates the perceptions and experiences of Grade 10 Physical Sciences learners regarding formative assessment in five secondary schools located in the uMkhanyakude district. Using Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory as the guiding framework, the study purposively selected ten participants—two from each school—via random sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured focus group interviews and thematically analyzed. Findings strongly suggest that while formative assessment can motivate learners and promote self-awareness about their academic progress, inconsistent implementation and lack of clarity in feedback often hinder its effectiveness. The study highlights critical gaps in practice and recommends that educators adopt learner-centred formative assessment strategies that foster self-regulated learning and deeper content comprehension.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.25
References
Abdumannopovna, M. M. (2024). Assessments and feedback techniques for promoting effective learning in higher education. In Konferensiyalar | Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 13, pp. 222–226).
Adarkwah, M. (2021). The power of assessment feedback in teaching and learning: A narrative review and synthesis of the literature. SN Social Sciences, 1(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00086-w
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T. L., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C. J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304-316.
Alharbi, A. S., Alhebshi, A., & Meccawy, Z. (2021). EFL students’ and teachers’ perceptions of Google Forms as a digital formative assessment tool in Saudi secondary schools. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.10.
Asy-Syila, A. (2024). Strategies for enhancing student motivation and achievement. Mauve Journal De Leardu, 1(1), 9-15.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Berisha, F., Vula, E., Gisewhite, R., & McDuffie, H. (2024). The effectiveness and challenges of implementing a formative assessment professional development program. Teacher Development, 28(1), 19-43.
Carroll, M., Lindsey, S., Chaparro, M., & Winslow, B. (2021). An applied model of learner engagement and strategies for increasing learner engagement in the modern educational environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 757-771.
Cobeña, G. T. B., & Moreno, J. A. V. (2021). Active methodologies in the teaching-learning process of the English language in baccalaureate. Polo del Conocimiento: Revista científica-profesional, 6(2), 464-482.
Engelbrecht, P. (2020). Inclusive education: Developments and challenges in South Africa. Prospects, 49(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09499-6
Fahmi, F., Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 342-351.
Fitriani, R., Anatri, L., Joint, O. S., & Risnita, R. (2023). Scope of learning evaluation in science subjects for junior high school students: A systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Education (JEE), 4(1), 8-16.
García-Alberti, M., Suárez, F., Chiyón, I., & Mosquera Feijoo, J. C. (2021). Challenges and experiences of online evaluation in courses of civil engineering during the lockdown learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(2), 59.
Ghozali, A. S., & Tyas, P. A. (2022). The importance of formative assessment based on students’ perception. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(2), 218-222.
Hill, L., & Edwards, F. (2019). Student perceptions of their involvement in formative assessment feedback practices: “I can do it myself.” Assessment Matters, 13, 6-43.
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40.
Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2021). New advances in second language acquisition methodology in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(3), 128.
Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: Assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 5-14.
Li, Y., & Singh, C. K. S. (2022). Review of formative assessment practices: Primary evidence on relationship with self-efficacy and self-esteem. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 49. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p49
Ma, H. A. (2021). From testing to active student learning: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ perception of formative assessment (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University).
Mdodana-Zide, L. (2023). Teacher’s pedagogical strategies in under-resourced rural schools in South Africa. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), 4(12, Special Issue), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234123
Menéndez, I. Y. C., Napa, M. A. C., Moreira, M. L. M., & Zambrano, G. G. V. (2019). The importance of formative assessment in the learning-teaching process. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 238-249.
Mngomezulu, H., Mkhize, T. F., & Nhlumayo, B. S. (2024). The role of formative feedback in teaching and learning: Grade 10 Physical Sciences teachers’ perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1-12.
Mngomezulu, H., Ramaila, S., Ramnarain, U., & Dhurumraj, T. (2024). Enhancing learners’ self-regulated learning in physical sciences classrooms through formative assessment intervention strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), em2524.
Mngomezulu, H., & Ramaila, S. (2024). Enhancing physical sciences performance through formative assessment strategies. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 66-79.
Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Creating a supportive classroom environment through effective feedback: Effects on students’ school identification and behavioral engagement. Frontiers in Education, 6, 661736. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.661736
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD. ISBN-10: 1416609113, ISBN-13: 978-1416609117.
Namaziandost, E., Kargar Behbahani, H., & Heydarnejad, T. (2024). Tapping the alphabets of learning-oriented assessment: Self-assessment, classroom climate, mindsets, trait emotional intelligence, and academic engagement are in focus. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 1-30.
Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: A comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296-1311.
Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of formative assessment in an online learning environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29-39.
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13-31.
Schneider, M. C., & Johnson, R. L. (2018). Using formative assessment to support student learning objectives. Routledge.
Seli, H. (2019). Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A focus on self-regulated learning. Routledge.
Shirk, J. (2020). Designing a self-paced learning experience to support learner self-regulation. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9(Special Issue), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29527.
Syaifuddin, M. (2019). The effect of students’ perception on classroom assessment to students’ attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042027.
Treve, M. (2021). English for academic purposes (EAP) lecturers' perceptions of formative assessment integration in the Thai EAP context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1096–1113.
Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2021). Formative assessment as a predictor of mathematics teachers' levels of metacognitive regulation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983-998.
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2024). The role of formative assessment and feedback practices in the classroom. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 4(8), 1407-1414.
Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49.
Yadav, S. (2024). Designing effective e-portfolios for authentic assessment: Encouraging reflection and promoting student ownership. In Cases on Authentic Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 235-258). IGI Global.
Yang, L., Chiu, M. M., & Yan, Z. (2021). The power of teacher feedback in affecting student learning and achievement: insights from students’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1964855
Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning: A critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 211-250.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Halalisani Mngomezulu, Sam Mabune Ramaila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
