Supporting Complex Educational Transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Digital Literacy PBL Case Study
Keywords:
Educational Transformation; Teacher Professional Development; Action Research; Project-Based Learning; Digital LiteracyAbstract
This research investigated educators undergoing simultaneous changes to their disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge to explore supports for teachers undergoing complex transformations to education. This topic is relevant within the context of increasingly rapid educational change. The research fills a gap in the literature in providing detailed accounts of the transformation process, particularly within the context of mainland China. The primary objective was to investigate a job-embedded teacher training in which teachers used action research for the design, implementation and evaluation of a project-based digital literacy programme. The participating teachers did not have previous training in digital literacy and did not typically teach using a project-based approach. The research used a case study methodology. Data sources included researcher field notes, artefact analysis and post-programme semi-structured interviews. Analysis indicated that the teachers’ use of a modified action-research protocol with job-embedded training provided effective support in applying new pedagogical and content knowledge as well as team management and collaborative processes. Implementation of the target programme for students still faced constraints from systemic pressures, such as conflicting assessment and leadership priorities. The research findings offer insight into practical considerations when helping teachers transition from traditional pedagogy to Project-Based Learning (PBL) or from teaching traditional literacy to digital literacy. The research also generated theoretical implications such as the need for educational leaders to plan tailored support for complex teaching and technological innovations. For this purpose, the Training Support for Educational Transformation (TSET) action-research model is proposed.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.19
References
Beckett, G. H., & Miller, P. C. (2006). Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future. Information Age.
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/cci024
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A.S., & Dexter, E.R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. Working Paper. MDRC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578933.pdf
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies (pp. 1–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context (2nd Ed.). O
Eaton, S. (2025). Global trends in education: Artificial intelligence, postplagiarism, and future-focused learning for 2025 and beyond – 2024–2025 Werklund Distinguished Research Lecture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(12), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00187-6.
EL Education. (2017, October 5). Austin's butterfly: Models, critique, and descriptive feedback [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_6PskE3zfQ
European Commission. (2022). The digital competence framework for citizens (DigComp 2.2). Publications Office of the European Union.
Fragoulis, I., & Tsiplakides, I. (2009). Project-based learning in the teaching of English as a foreign language in Greek primary schools: From theory to practice. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n3p113
Gee, J. P. (2014). Literacy and education. Routledge.
Gibbons, P. (2014). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
Guo, Y. (2006). Project-based English as a second language instruction for adult immigrants. Adult Basic Education, 16(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2096
Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. In M. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Digital literacies in language education (pp. 119–135). Palgrave Macmillan.
Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. (2018). Leading project-based learning: Supporting teachers to improve student outcomes. Routledge.
Hazard, R. (2018). English for academic purposes: Enhancing critical digital literacy outcomes [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 2018 Asian Conference on Language Learning, Japan, (pp. 83-95). IAFOR
Hazard, R. (2019). Supporting 21st century skills in language and literacy classrooms with a multiliteracies approach. In Proceedings of the 2019 IAFOR European Conference on Language Learning, (pp. 149-159).: IAFOR
Hazard, R. (2023). Project-based learning for sustainable development: An open educational research framework for design. In Proceedings of the 2023 Barcelona Conference on Education, (pp. 879-893). IAFOR. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2435-9467.2023.70
Hazard, R. & Liu, L. (2024). Facilitator training for interdisciplinary project-based learning: A professional development case study. In Proceedings of the 2024 Asian Conference on Education and Development, (pp. 421-432). IAFOR. https://doi.org/0.22492/issn.2189-101X.2024.34
Hazard, R., Eplin, R., Liu, L., & Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2025). Action research teacher training within a project-based learning paradigm. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 28(8), 965-988. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.43
Hubbard, P. (2013). Technology and professional development. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 382–399). Bloomsbury.
Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.
Jones, R. H. (2023). Digital literacies and language learning. In: Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning (pp. 184-194). Routledge.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 423–437). Routledge.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.citejournal.org
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. & Boss., S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Liau, A., Park, Y., Gentile, D., Katna, D., Tan, C., & Khoo, A. (2015). iZ HERO adventure: Evaluating the effectiveness of a peer-mentoring and transmedia cyberwellness program for children. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 6(4). 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000094
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed). Taylor and Francis.
Merriam, S. B. & Baumgartner, L. M. (2020). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. (2012). Beyond “Job-embedded”: Ensuring that good professional development gets results. https://www.niet.org/assets/ResearchAndPolicyResources/688a72b19e/beyond_job_embedded_professional_development.pdf
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the-future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Curriculum (re)design: A series of thematic reports from the OECD education project. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/2-1-curriculum-design/brochure-thematic-reports-on-curriculum-redesign.pdf
Özel, M. (Ed.). (2025). Digital literacy as a catalyst for critical thinking: From media to artificial intelligence. Springer.
Purmayanti, Devi. (2022). The challenges of implementing digital literacy in teaching and learning activities for EFL learners in Indonesia. BATARA DIDI: English Language Journal. 1(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.56209/badi.v1i2.38
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass.
Sah, F., Sasikirana, H., & Pujiani, T. (2024). The implementation of project-based learning in developing 21st century skills in EFL class. Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education. 4(4). 257-272. https://doi.org/10.52760/jadila.v4i4.797
Santos, M., Gupta, R., & Petrova, S. (2025). Pedagogical leadership and the implementation of project-based curriculum: Impact on students' problem-solving abilities in Australia. Jurnal Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1). 98-107. https://doi.org/10.71305/jmpi.v3i1.86
Saunders, W.M., Goldenberg, C.N., & Gallimore, R. (2009, December). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of Title I schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006–1033. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333185
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Portfolio Penguin.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G. H. Beckett, & P. C. Miller, (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 19-40). Information Age.
UNESCO. (2015). Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from: https://www.unesdoc.unesco.org
UNESCO. (2017a). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2017b). Literacy in a digital world: Global education monitoring report. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2017c). Reading the past, writing the future: Fifty years of promoting literacy. UNESCO Publishing.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd Ed.). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment: Strategies for classroom assessment that drives student engagement and learning. Solution Tree Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zhang L, Ma Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Russell Hazard, Matthew Michaud, Chang Chen, Deliang Wang, Li Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
