Exploring The Academic Motivation of Malaysian and Chinese University Students: A Dual-Theoretical Analysis based on Self-Determination and Cognitive Perspectives

Authors

  • Li Haitao
  • Zhu Fangmin
  • Yu Song
  • Hang Lei
  • Yao Jialiang
  • Phawani Vijayaratnam
  • Bereket Merkine Gebresilase
  • Subashini K Rajanthran

Keywords:

student motivation; Self-Determination Theory; expectancy–value; intrinsic and extrinsic motivation; higher education; China; Malaysia; SDG 4

Abstract

In examination-oriented university systems in China and Malaysia, what drives undergraduates to pursue high achievement, and how do intrinsic and extrinsic motives shape their learning behaviors? Addressing this question, we integrate Self-Determination Theory with cognitive perspectives (expectancy–value and attribution). We collected semi-structured interviews with 25 undergraduates using purposive sampling across institutions, majors, genders, and years of study. Responses were analysed using thematic analysis to code and classify emergent themes. Findings show motivation as a negotiated mix of internal desires (curiosity, competence, autonomy) and external pressures (parental expectations, grades, scholarships, and instructor recognition). Six recurrent configurations emerged: (1) achievement as self-worth and future pathway; (2) teacher feedback and classroom climate; (3) peer comparison and support; (4) curiosity-driven exploration; (5) effort-based attributions; and (6) self-regulation in the absence of feedback. Timely, effort-focused feedback and utility value, sustaining strategy use and persistence. Conversely, missing or vague feedback dampened engagement unless students had established self-regulatory routines. Extrinsic demands were more readily internalised when autonomy and competence were supported. Theoretically, we outline an SDT × Cognitive process account linking need satisfaction to expectancies, task values, and attributions that, in turn, guide strategy use and persistence. Practically, the study recommends autonomy-supportive teaching with regular low-stakes formative feedback, visible task utility, limited choice within assignments, and explicit training in self-regulation. These implications inform student-centred reforms aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 4 to improve education quality.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.1.11

References

Adipat, S., & Chotikapanich, R. (2022). Sustainable development goal 4: an education goal to achieve equitable quality education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(6,174-183).https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0159

Akintayo, O. T., Eden, C. A., Ayeni, O. O., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(5), 1395-1422. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026

Alamer, A., & Lee, J. (2024). Language achievement predicts anxiety and not the other way around: A cross-lagged panel analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 1572-1593.https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211033694

Alcántara-Rubio, L., Valderrama-Hernández, R., Solís-Espallargas, C., & Ruiz-Morales, J. (2022). The implementation of the SDGs in universities: a systematic review. Environmental Education Research, 28(11), 1585-1615.https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2063798

Artino Jr, A. R., Simons, R. J., & Konopasky, A. (2022). Self-regulated learning. In An Introduction to Medical Teaching: The Foundations of Curriculum Design, Delivery, and Assessment (pp. 25-43). Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85524-6_3

Bai, B., Wang, J., & Nie, Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: What has the most predictive power for primary school students’ self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context? Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 65-84.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1778639

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (GPT-5) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/

Chen, C. S. H., HO, M. C., GOH, Q. R., OOI, P. B., & SIAU, C. S. (2024). The Relationship of Parental Control on Academic Self-Efficacy Among Secondary School Students in Selangor. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3), 110-121.https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i3.373

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40+ years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1.https ://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000275

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 51.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9

Fong, C. J., & Schallert, D. L. (2023). “Feedback to the future”: Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 146-161.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2134135

Gale, J., Alemdar, M., Cappelli, C., & Morris, D. (2021). A mixed methods study of self-efficacy, the sources of self-efficacy, and teaching experience. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 750599). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.750599

Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: how are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in psychology, 12, 697045.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045

Gebauer, M. M., McElvany, N., Köller, O., & Schöber, C. (2021). Cross-cultural differences in academic self-efficacy and its sources across socialization contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 24(6), 1407-1432.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09658-3

Gebresilase, B. M., Zhao, W., Taddese, E. T., Elka, Z. Z., & Feng, Y. (2025). The mediating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between student teacher interaction and students’ university academic achievement. Cogent Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2500181

Ghaleb, B. D. S. (2024). Effect of exam-focused and teacher-centered education systems on students’ cognitive and psychological competencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(2), 611-631.https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i02.648

Gladstone, J. R., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2022). Situated expectancy-value theory, dimensions of engagement, and academic outcomes. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 57-76). Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_3

Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2021). Motivation and Learning Strategies: Student Motivation Affects Student Learning Strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Kakinuma, K., Nakai, M., Hada, Y., Kizawa, M., & Tanaka, A. (2022). Praise affects the “Praiser”: Effects of ability-focused vs. effort-focused praise on motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(3), 634-655.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1799313

Lazarides, R., Dicke, A. L., Rubach, C., Oppermann, E., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Motivational profiles across domains and academic choices within Eccles et al.’s situated expectancy–value theoretical framework. Developmental Psychology, 57(11), 1893.https ://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001250

Le, T. T., & Pham, T. T. (2025). Balancing the scale: examining the impact of publication quotas on academic well-being in Vietnamese higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-15.https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2486188

Lee, H. J., & Mendoza, N. B. (2025). Does parental support amplify growth mindset predictions for student achievement and persistence? Cross-cultural findings from 76 countries/regions. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 88.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10038-4

Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Creating a supportive classroom environment through effective feedback: Effects on students’ school identification and behavioral engagement. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 661736). Frontiers Media SA.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.661736

Muenks, K., & Yan, V. X. (2022). University STEM instructors with stronger failure-as-debilitating mindsets are perceived to engage in fewer mastery-oriented teaching practices by their students: An exploratory study. Social Psychology of Education, 25(5), 1205-1219.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09718-2

Ng, F. F. Y., & Li, Y. (2025). PARENTING GOALS AND VALUES IN ASIAN CULTURES. Asian Parenting: Meanings, Characteristics, and Implications.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003383949-3

Nieminen, J. H., Bagger, A., Padilla, A., & Tan, P. (2023). Student positioning in mathematics assessment research: A critical review. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 54(5), 317-341.https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0030

Pakpahan, F. H., & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory of cognitive development by Jean Piaget. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 55-60.https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.79

Rasli, A., Tee, M., Lai, Y. L., Tiu, Z. C., & Soon, E. H. (2022). Post-COVID-19 strategies for higher education institutions in dealing with unknown and uncertainties. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.992063

Robinson, C. D. (2022). A framework for motivating teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2061-2094.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09706-0

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630

Schweder, S., & Raufelder, D. (2024). Does changing learning environments affect student motivation? Learning and Instruction, 89, 101829.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101829

Sharafi, M. (2024). An Exploration into the Interrelation between EFL Learners’ Self-Regulated Learning, Self-Determined Motivation, and Academic Persistence. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v5i1.157

Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87-113.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603

Sökmen, Y. (2021). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, 47(1), 19-37.https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986

Squires, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In Varieties of qualitative research methods: Selected contextual perspectives (pp. 463-468). Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_72

Tam, A. C. F. (2025). Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-16.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2451086

Tamura, A., Ishii, R., Yagi, A., Fukuzumi, N., Hatano, A., Sakaki, M., ... & Murayama, K. (2022). Exploring the within-person contemporaneous network of motivational engagement. Learning and Instruction, 81, 101649.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101649

Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 45.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

Wang, T., Liu, Q., Luo, H., & Liu, J. (2021). Testing the “thresholds” of high school students’ learning motivation, learning pressure and subjective well-being: an example of S province in East China. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 39(3), 59.https://10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.006

Wang, X., & Wang, S. (2024). Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with large language models: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102014.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102014

Yim, E. P. Y. (2022). Effects of Asian cultural values on parenting style and young children’s perceived competence: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 905093.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905093

Zhang, B. (2022). The relationship between Chinese EFL learners’ resilience and academic motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 871554.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871554

Zhao, T., & Baharom, S. B. (2023). The Effect of Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on Chinese Architectural Higher Vocational Non-English Majored Students' Intrinsic Motivation and Oral English Achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (108). https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2023.108.009

Zhao, Y. (2024). The impact of EFL teachers’ emotioncy level on their motivation and academic engagement. Learning and Motivation, 87, 101990.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101990

Zhou, L., Gao, Y., Hu, J., Tu, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Effects of perceived teacher support on motivation and engagement amongst Chinese college students: Need satisfaction as the mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 949495.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949495

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Haitao , L. ., Fangmin, Z., Song, Y. ., Lei, H. ., Jialiang, Y. ., Vijayaratnam, P. ., Gebresilase, B. M. ., & Rajanthran, S. K. (2026). Exploring The Academic Motivation of Malaysian and Chinese University Students: A Dual-Theoretical Analysis based on Self-Determination and Cognitive Perspectives. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(1), 215–233. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2661